IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 02 October 2018 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E928B131199; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4MBqgx5GwOZ; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B851310E3; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD1166013A; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:30:17 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbEXvSyU_GS6; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:30:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2486600BF; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:30:16 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <C52965D0-1E48-4790-92F5-F3185E4C43E5@cooperw.in>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 23:30:10 +0200
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update@ietf.org, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E6C9FA8D-0AFA-4084-B6E4-9638268AC0CF@piuha.net>
References: <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C52965D0-1E48-4790-92F5-F3185E4C43E5@cooperw.in>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AKzBhcPSwJleb24kV9TETlwi9V4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:30:22 -0000

> I’ve heard this there is a little confusion about the timeline for appointments if this document is approved soon and the current NomCom is asked to seat trustees, so I’d like to suggest the following clarification:
> 
> OLD 
> The terms of the appointed trustees from IETF NomCom shall be three years.  The initial selection shall be one, two, and three year terms in order to initially stagger the terms and thus miminize potential annual Trustee turnover.  The other appointments by the IESG and the ISOC Board of Trustees shall be two year terms, with the initial terms being one and two years, respectively.
> 
> NEW 
> The terms of the appointed trustees from IETF NomCom shall be three years.  The initial selection shall be one, two, and three year terms in order to initially stagger the terms and thus miminize potential annual Trustee turnover.  The other appointments by the IESG and the ISOC Board of Trustees shall be two year terms, with the initial terms being one and two years, respectively. The term lengths of initial appointees should be measured from the First IETF of the year in which they are seated even if they are appointed after the First IETF of the year.

Sounds reasonable, and definitely clearer. Thanks.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email