IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDF83A08F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:09:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYTrHu2Zgq2u for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9833A08F4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 29D2C1739EEB8C0815C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:09:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:09:03 +0000
Received: from lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) by lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:09:03 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) by lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:09:03 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.202]) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.213]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:08:56 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
Thread-Topic: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
Thread-Index: AdXiOVKQQty5FztgSDufQNr/j0lurALJNfBg
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:08:55 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD27DA0CFE@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AOU2kGaZ8Xm1i8mwg54cgLDVirA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:09:09 -0000

FYI,
>From the Broad Band Forum:
The BBF Q1 Annual face-to-face meeting on March 2 - 5, 2020 in Budapest, Hungary will be held as planned
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Alston
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 8:48 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am just wondering if there are any thoughts on the status of the IETF 107
> meeting in light of the corona virus.
> 
> Particularly in light of the fact that for safety reasons mobile world congress
> has been cancelled and we're seeing other events being cancelled in light of
> this as well.  Should it be considered a safe and responsible move to go
> ahead with this meeting or should we be looking at an entirely virtual
> meeting in light of the situation?
> 
> Andrew

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email