Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)

[Keith Moore <[e-mail]>]

Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> If I am reading this correctly the UK Centre for the Protection of
> National Infrastructure
> wants the IETF (or some other body) to produce a "companion document to
> the IETF specifications that discusses the security aspects and
> implications of the protocols, identifies the existing vulnerabilities,
> discusses the possible countermeasures, and analyses their respective
> effectiveness."

It's difficult to imagine that these things could be adequately captured
in a static document, for TCP or any other protocol, because new threats
and countermeasures continue to be identified decades after the base
protocol is well-settled.  Maybe something like an expanded version of
the RFC Editor's errata pages would be more appropriate?