Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 26 February 2021 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D0C3A0D50; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:17:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNpNovsBZq9y; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:17:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748C33A0D4E; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:17:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b9:15ed:9bd5:c92f] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b9:15ed:9bd5:c92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA6E160004C; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:17:12 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1614331032; bh=Zq65ff/v8c5dG7LRocilCHQSjdsWZ8rrEPgln8WdRBc=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=RlmFROOWljK1oAIQAGf/7yDmGztDAxysQrq8ggTbUvItHzjXonyKDSoK33YKNyZUc riylRgaUBK3Rm4cgvr/3D56mczN0hZae1Vp8LAaZdBQemMt6j6VQICDW6vAazsthr7 +GGqEL63dXIY6mgZCKZHjzbU4Ew+hRM45rfYZLws=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <8CA4D602-70BE-4D57-A0B7-3D242730E02A@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F290C86-14BB-4544-82CA-BB58737211D7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:17:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <d261ac26-7ae0-1327-1bfc-d960fb750ec4@si6networks.com>
Cc: Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>, Dominique Lazanski <dml@lastpresslabel.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <446A8D6B-E624-49E0-B67E-D1F8AFC794E2@lastpresslabel.com> <28ac1e86-f641-b9e8-0f61-6ff442feaa90@si6networks.com> <LO2P265MB057322BA95B1B44D4175356BC29E9@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <b24ce0e9-8912-12b1-af8a-6024ae83288f@si6networks.com> <25E1B1D5-E8F1-4053-A1E0-6B2948577E84@akamai.com> <3a8dca6d-0aca-d578-0f7a-3f68e2811bad@si6networks.com> <37B1C77B-2CCF-4D70-9332-BF4F6CBE7C22@eggert.org> <d261ac26-7ae0-1327-1bfc-d960fb750ec4@si6networks.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: CA6E160004C.A1DD6
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AXFDwZz8nzIfaxINuerTncDYe1A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:17:24 -0000

On 2021-2-26, at 11:09, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity: has the experience been documented such that e.g. other groups could learn/reproduce the adjustments you referred to?

I think RFC8874/8875 capture what we did.

Thanks,
Lars