IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 04 April 2016 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7612D870 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id meSerhQFx1hM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06CE12D182 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316D92CCE2; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:28:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8762RFcQtCK; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:28:50 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2362CC9A; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:28:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D09FE3C4-77A8-4C98-840C-177717C41293"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5702CBA2.2060802@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:28:46 -0300
Message-Id: <19FD9771-D4A1-4D1A-87BF-A11F2BEC3E6A@piuha.net>
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net> <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com> <F99F459688AAAFCDCD5D9CC1@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5702CBA2.2060802@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AexnehTBHDvKrocb0R3PBzEWR5s>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:28:56 -0000

> Well, *exactly*. That's why I don't think that ADs or WGCs need to
> be called out in any particular way: they participate and therefore
> if they are reasonably and personally aware of IPR, they must disclose
> (and if they can't disclose, they need to stop participating in
> that particular case).

Right, and I think we all are actually in agreement over this.

Personally, I’d love to see the draft talk about AD participation just like it talks about other people's participation. If I really haven’t participated in WG X, well, I haven’t, even if my co-AD owns the group :-) And if I did participate, well, I should declare the IPR that I know of :-)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email