Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 17:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9E53A1285 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOwbwXiekVjD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C123A127E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id r7so2053978qkf.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=itZcvlWB+2kqGvRTzTOY57caVFfJ78h7dyrPs2Q5yHU=; b=1WV8HVDJrrwRhgB7QQVpaXdguoGmeGE6Omvp/Ufz+dcZAajHJIvj5JBJ/lkcUSwuaf sWpKB3EyxNaNhoMfqqi6OrqKLv2bbDIG1+s+MuldL6KztTE9u9tUJEcdSmtGApIUkQpF Sn6S+UWpXq91gjlI5+CrwzXGyjFn98Aa0yLxxG7GWrni/gjQBdYZ4+oPwhhgDIEh1+Ll VFfC56jhUKgRfi+0z1MOIMLNLuaB9upNv9Cq/3cwMQsfCW+dsSa0QCXAYSfVKlndImbv S+TjzvjeVjJ1zUqNSoLh0VR9qocinOXEeKt1gRMackgDYYc7FzKW1h3N2PZBIlmt3gk+ 0KMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=itZcvlWB+2kqGvRTzTOY57caVFfJ78h7dyrPs2Q5yHU=; b=Wi/JSTPwGnMdcmq0lNkpq2qKiIR9O+l7U1REL6ZI2SFGA5mv9v0Qnlb+sCb7ZEaeZo MCsYSzep5E8xCf/LFiOaEMxo9m5X2bck4+Xdzkz0q9hBor6eo9GH8r9yGlUeyjqpc4Rq QadKmHKpQC0stMVG1StVajt/70H+u+9dKZhdAQHMJAuy1lq0wdVLzMmMP4sNlGO33yM0 2Cv56pH53eD7ZLsvbaN4NTHC667jQD4Y8BmZCcATGutuMdDTFpwKqIA8+xG3pSJZlwhB gaBSZnpx+jKbQma9gCttGYuIn/ysNFqCDOH3xyYGi+lNR61iKeis1fn9No2pg+WNMgQk lOdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bIe0EMmQeREJM6kqRd23Myen1JH+mFU8vP5FTQGbQFoypHR5X v9g+9uqtDDmpX2fHfwKN3DGgeA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2a+E2hKmFdvPMLRqYb3s5Sn9zEgsTNwj+xvq7hn0snf5Pyy3GQvPuFWTx70qFJzEG1dxMlw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b246:: with SMTP id b67mr145113qkf.309.1603821582148; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.70] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z69sm1212761qkb.7.2020.10.27.10.59.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <D0067A1E-2C86-4174-9344-9887120BA37E@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08383BD2-49A7-4C1B-B32C-1455A74474C1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:59:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7AEF79AB-8CDF-4414-BBB8-D1EA9716F82F@juniper.net>
Cc: EXT - randy <randy@psg.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "rsoc@iab.org" <rsoc@iab.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <20201026180105.GQ48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <03976f9f-7f49-7bf7-ce29-ee989232a44d@gmail.com> <7FA8EF59-5CDE-42B9-A487-520531EEA1F0@juniper.net> <m2sg9z1seh.wl-randy@psg.com> <3DC65259-20A7-4AFA-BC24-604AB184081E@fugue.com> <7AEF79AB-8CDF-4414-BBB8-D1EA9716F82F@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Am7wL6clWGPvYsYMpCV448QpNM0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:59:45 -0000
On Oct 27, 2020, at 1:54 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote: > So far, nobody has even attempted to justify this directive, although a zoo of straw men has been paraded through the subsequent follow ups. Actually, John, I have explained the reasoning behind this twice, as have several other people. If the IETF provides a pagination tool, then people will use it and assume that the page numbers rendered in their version of the document are good to use in referencing the document. Whether this is a valid concern or not, I can’t say, but that is the justification.
- Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (w… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) … Robert Sparks
- Re: [irsg] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [irsg] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Not a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty pl… John Levine
- Re: Not a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty pl… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [irsg] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Not a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty pl… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [irsg] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? John Scudder
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Carsten Bormann
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Not a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty pl… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Flemming Andreasen
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? John C Klensin
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Matty K
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? David Noveck
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? John C Klensin
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Randy Bush
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Keith Moore
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Keith Moore
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: RFC mutation, with or without page numbers John Levine
- RE: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Andrew Campling
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Mark Andrews
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? Matthew Kerwin