Re: A mailing list protocol

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 06 December 2012 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A2521F87F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:03:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTlorwKUIq5y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4983B21F87F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:03:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1354817013; bh=SdnPkKvhCQxzOPTCykayD5mPrGuJRRcilIlv6Y7oRbU=; l=383; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=u+fE95os5R3JVossDRpcjZiBhKdfYk4JMWlstNqd9Oa78zRPrIbRMoPTMAyAzmtWp 1b4PeqhslWmgzzLoARYUk/QcWZkhuD/n53M4Myq0fvl/7MfaeqaYhdoJUW6GAzNLoD bmdpjbCW1JmGrLjoaW88MOezQhVsBq0+a14RtdK0=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:03:33 +0100 id 00000000005DC031.0000000050C0DDF5.00006EF7
Message-ID: <50C0DDF5.2020006@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:03:33 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: A mailing list protocol
References: <20121204183432.3748.97064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121204121234.09360870@resistor.net> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338CCCD84@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <7256.1354797367.419104@puncture>
In-Reply-To: <7256.1354797367.419104@puncture>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:03:36 -0000

On Thu 06/Dec/2012 13:36:07 +0100 Dave Cridland wrote:
> 
> In general, there are a number of technical standards and protocols
> which are useful, or essential, for IETF participation; documenting
> these in a single location would seem beneficial.

Don't forget the confidentiality notices conundrum, see e.g.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg67495.html