IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 10 March 2020 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E89C3A15F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bH7ekYkXY1_8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4DA93A15D6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD0E548047; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:45:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 36CAD440040; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:45:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:45:45 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19
Message-ID: <20200310164545.GB13518@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CF8C876F-B494-42AB-AB6B-C6E022F2020E@consulintel.es> <8b392292-69b0-0de3-1605-2556cb0ce4e7@meetecho.com> <9477CB7B-D2ED-4F72-98BE-9C62E632FAF3@ericsson.com> <269634BE62939E4FDA7F81F9@PSB> <CAAuWHCJKnwk4gxjUMNvbM_5mh9OrUyMqc1MGRxKzNF3w3K+QSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAuWHCLrecE=TpfGv=hP41vVpFw+O2rY4iENTTwfjCs82BvCcQ@mail.gmail.com> <170c4391440.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <7EA9B301-D302-43E6-99D2-A6F89B245C27@cisco.com> <B6C182ED-89A8-40A9-BEB9-186EBA6BD898@strayalpha.com> <6b91c609-96de-0ebd-9415-e7b77eab4e63@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <6b91c609-96de-0ebd-9415-e7b77eab4e63@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AzVtPY0lrUPH23FssJgEsr7idfA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:45:53 -0000

What is said here on the thread might partially be meant funny,
but maybe some are not too shabby ideas for the "next new normal"
after the short term measures to throttle the spread are working.
For Madrid and beyond.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:00:39AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
> well with the likely number of attendees, it's likely it'll be possible to
> support the recommended 2M separation between chairs/attendees...
> 
> On 3/10/2020 10:57 AM, Joseph Touch wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Mar 10, 2020, at 7:35 AM, Eliot Lear
> > > <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
> > > <mailto:lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> > > 
> > > My favorite is this one:
> > > 
> > > > Event activities 	Will participants be participating in
> > > > activities that promote transmission? 	Activities that could
> > > > contribute to spread: singing, cheering, close physical contact
> > > > such as when participating in contact sports, sharing food or
> > > > beverages, etc. High importance
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One could envision some activities to avoid, such as the IETF Rugby
> > > League (Routing v. ART, Internet v. Security, and Transport v.
> > > General).  Losers must take Friday slots in Madrid.
> > 
> > Some WGs are a contact sport???
> > 
> > Joe

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email