IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tue, 16 August 2016 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A165D12D18B; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22yx5vP-FcHN; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA06112D182; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 232E27F0DE; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:38:06 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20160816153806.GA4778@lst.de>
References: <20160628150730.24155.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5D4F49@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5D4F49@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/B2XCyS5akq0gY0U0VLJL_qQ8e2c>
Cc: "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:38:08 -0000

Hi David, I think I have addressed all your requests, except for
the SAM-5 update.

As far as I can tell T10 has delivered the final document for SAM-5,
but it has not been approved by ANSI or ISO yet.  I'm not sure
if that is an issue for RFC or not, but I don't know how to quote
it in a RFC without the ANSI or ISO standards number.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email