IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Fri, 13 January 2017 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A3F129B0A; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:55:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OCNbImw6X6w5; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323E5129DAF; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D6D8F7; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:07 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.205]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id sM3DEgGTkRFe; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810502009D; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLcLQabgylkL; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B1F20090; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9BA163E20DB3; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:55:07 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12
Message-ID: <20170113195505.GC24768@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, ops-dir@ietf.org, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <148429722186.26907.8095583118694640603.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmWaeo5JuijFMEG+MvO6VqtV3T2_cibbU_cXas2+oLFk9A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWaeo5JuijFMEG+MvO6VqtV3T2_cibbU_cXas2+oLFk9A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/B9K0yIokYnlmiGJpgtM4Pnp2PL0>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 19:55:10 -0000

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:11:57AM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> >
> > - Does the Interface ID related to other interface numbers, e.g.,
> >   SNMP's ifIndex? Or is this an entirely separate number space? Or
> >   does it depend on the implementor's choice?
> >
> GIM>> This comes from PTP. AFAIK, it is different from SNMP index.
> 

If this is specifically a PTP Interface ID, it might be desirable to
be explicit about this and that it may be different from other numeric
interface IDs. (This is what I heard you saying, I do not know much
about PTP and surely not any details how PTP defines Interface IDs.

/js

PS: This was actually the only operational comment I had. From an
    operational perspective, it is important to know whether interface
    numbers us a common or possibly different numbering scheme.

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email