Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ulrich,
At 13:25 11-02-2013, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
>(it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name).

Agreed.

Your comment reminded me of the message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep/current/msg00085.html

>Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and
>others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value.
>See below:

Agreed.

>I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to
>this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document,

It was a gentle note to one of the authors (see Note 4).

I pointed to two reviews about a draft and mentioned that the first 
one was clearer to me.

>I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation".
>There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned
>draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread.

I agree that it is better to stick to the topic.  I'll answer in here 
as to avoid generating two messages.  I meant that I have never 
interacted with the person through email or in person.  There is less 
bias [1].  The content of the message matters; it does not matter who wrote it.

Regards,
-sm

1. www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/notes/snodgrass-tods-2007.pdf