Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 30 November 2020 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0318E3A0F09 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:51:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0xorL-r-CfY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68533A0F06 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:14d8:8fc4:ea50:433] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:14d8:8fc4:ea50:433]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 500137220B805; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:51:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <56fa6493-3182-783b-1db5-ff310ff0dec7@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:51:21 +0100
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <15943263-E9A6-4AD7-B7CF-FDB23A518FE2@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <af6ab231024c478bbd28bbec0f9c69c9@cert.org> <5FC24768.2020603@btconnect.com> <e170d248-8559-a64b-eaa0-620d78746f1c@gmx.de> <5FC4E5FD.2090800@btconnect.com> <06dc6458-6812-77a8-57a0-ddba0654ca82@gmx.de> <5FC52586.5060208@btconnect.com> <56fa6493-3182-783b-1db5-ff310ff0dec7@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BC6-6DJixiv1W3wJS8laL2RgdJI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:51:30 -0000

> On 30. Nov 2020, at 18:47, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 30.11.2020 um 18:01 schrieb tom petch:
>> ...
>> Julian
>> 
>> I keyed in the URL you gave above for RFC7230.  Using Internet Explorer
>> (as installed by HP with Windows), 'Save as' gives me the four choices of
>> 
>> Webpage complete htm html
>> Web Archive single file mht
>> Webpage HTML only htm, html
>> Text File txt
>> 
>> from which I chose Text File.  Viewing the result with Wordpad gives me
>> the CSS followed by the text.  The text is ok AFAICT but all that CSS is
>> unwelcome and is what I referred to as broken.
>> ...
> 
> Apologies, read this too late.
> 
> I just tried, and it works as it should for me.
Are you using the same browser as Tom (on the same OS)?

Best regards
Michael
> 
>> File-Properties tells me that this is
>> Type HTML Document
>> which seems plausible with a
>> Created: 30/11/2020 (I am in a European Locale)
>> which is the same for all that I look at on the rfc-editor site via
>> https: - accessing the IETF site File-Properties shows the date as
>> Not Available
>> 
>> I see no sign of Text/Plain (which, as you gather, is close to my heart:-)
>> 
>> Tom Petch
> 
> Are you 100% sure you're inspecting the correct file?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
>