IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Quality of Directorate reviews

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BB31208AE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:10:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dVsWpO6agsz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85CE12088F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id i10so6122786wrs.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:10:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=74rMz8yMPGhb+6CrvGCR1e2HLv4zeYhiFXDGWDpMDj0=; b=vVl+J7Mqjrwks2YP9BKkad1XvaezEVflQcNWuxXggePjEAi4LKDhL6cSpMAuEQELQz N21iwNQEnBK8wzYZ/D9rA3t9w/JK+6vCNs22hyTrvJAoWxmNEVtajOOmYbyqkBa1v1A4 iWoajSP0okLjwPV/VUpi2liB9zRaYCfWORFXpl8oeVSOTqhgygBHA5I5tauofYhPh1OX vzoxS06ZFmrWUXLU+qhuUOEbRt4hVPfuZt7csi8Ysx49D8VtMnn4nAttaxutp9V5++TP r7P01nce93xeZx0fhL3mtKp7zOtxmibSHN8heLnYI6lgJiLjEmd4D98P+y27uuswNb6J DIdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=74rMz8yMPGhb+6CrvGCR1e2HLv4zeYhiFXDGWDpMDj0=; b=Z+xASRlmO04Z+Rv4zIRD1CfiDtEY5snSa8aA7oslqPur5ZcCNp5H+5ppD+y4G/j+CW pyJWFFiDiTy1qdpjCUpCMroi6BNfNdw/aFgyJtRQed/l7ZVj1M0mpg7k4vVWhVOWMudm g84x0FN6w5CTBj6S2oV03DsgEyVQwsoCamOr4cOMVNTIX3bpqwn/K5isHmUu9VcN0czZ DFN1IUbfXQpgxIA86BM99wox5ivr5530AHLev+tPHYfHZTMZCPf9kb+sPPbgZQ+mUlvL MDyC7CIdiH+4euqY9Jvhb+9EWHX161H5LsCh231Oj83v0sDKVyon02pRpVdOAt6QuOXG j1Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWa5+sP+tqTByr5SgbR2R9r2yQraHDbD2QZefpWIjKBtJM6/EcJ 5IAJNlOFDiD8hZfjK3do8IU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyh/6Sp2JW1WGPpp6fQ9ryA16CZuYqvyUi93YM274Dqckymek7WAjnR1zqUzSpt9dnlly766g==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e5cf:: with SMTP id a15mr3901472wrn.143.1573060251361; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:10:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:dcc8:ba76:7e6f:8cb9? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:dcc8:ba76:7e6f:8cb9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i71sm32550228wri.68.2019.11.06.09.10.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:10:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <15BCDF05-FB13-45D2-A5DF-70618EBA1A5A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_702A455C-83CD-46C8-8DE6-3E99DD722F97"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Quality of Directorate reviews
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:10:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20191.1573054128@localhost>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43669E4CEF13CDA51A764F9AB5790@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20191.1573054128@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BFBWzCwPSoi4oiU3wlYGnocOs9A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:10:55 -0000

Hi,

> On Nov 6, 2019, at 7:28 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Perhaps RFCs could list (within the document) who reviewed/approved
>> them, and in which role/capacity the review had been performed.
> 
> +10.
> 
>> This could serve two purposes:
>> - some minimal reward for those individuals taking the time to review the document,
>> - encouragement for the reviewers to ensure that an adequate review has been performed based on the role/capacity in which they are acting.
> 
> I've also suggested that the XML for the acknowledgement section be
> structured so that we could extract this information better.

All of this (reviewers, Shepard, AD reviews, ballots, etc.) is captured in the datatracker currently.   I am not sure why it would also need to be in the document.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email