IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 22 October 2013 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3570E21F9D1C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOTkccadAROO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167E921F9929 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729992CCBE; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:46:56 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcxsqWLhx9Cq; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:46:55 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BD42CC48; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:46:53 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5266CE7C.2020503@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:46:51 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <61EE8145-2184-44C1-8163-424F97F8286C@piuha.net>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com> <5266B4A4.9020301@dcrocker.net> <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com> <0B5A250AE70FD6B21DD3CF4C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5266CE7C.2020503@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:47:49 -0000

> Strangely enough, I concur too.

Agree here as well.

FWIW and in full disclosure, I was in agreement with the suggestion that the mail was problematic, and told Brian and Jordi about my opinion. I still think so, but in retrospect I should have specified why I believed there was a problem (NOT due to anonymity). Had I done that, I'm sure Jordi's e-mail would have had a different text, even if the outcome would have been the same. Sorry. We'll improve communication in the future.

I have another observation from this case that we might try to learn from. If people have an issue with a posting, should they contact the sergeant-at-arms in public or in private?

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email