Re: Poll: Restructuring questions

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Fri, 24 September 2004 17:06 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26622; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAtdk-0006EG-L5; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:13:49 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAtE3-0004wa-Oc; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:47:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAsto-0008G1-QU for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:26:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22168 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:26:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAt0p-0004vF-BQ for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:33:36 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2004 09:28:26 -0700
Received: from wells.cisco.com (wells.cisco.com [171.71.177.223]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8OGPeSI016177; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ole@localhost) by wells.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id JAA11767; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:25:45 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <89A0E4FF9BF9A11A96AB0627@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPX.4.58.0409240917040.14056@wells.cisco.com>
References: <89A0E4FF9BF9A11A96AB0627@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Poll: Restructuring questions
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15

Since you've gone through the trouble of creating a web page, it would be
really nice to have links to all the relevant restructuring docs, existing
procedures and so on. I was looking for just such a link to point my
readers to so that they could join or follow these discussion, but I gave
up and thought "we'll cover it when it's a done deal."

But if you could do, you have until Monday for the next issue :-) All I
really need is a link to a page which says "coming soon" at this stage.

Ole



Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Academic Research and Technology Initiatives, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> The discussion on IETF restructuring has had a few strong voices, some
> different opinions, and a lot of listeners.
>
> My talks with people have convinced me that many of those who have said
> nothing are indeed following the debate - some of them have opinions on
> what to do, some think that others are better positioned to decide than
> they are, and some thinkm other things.
>
> So we are trying another mechanism to get your input.
> There's a poll up at
> <http://tools.ietf.org/poll/admin_scenario_alternatives/> that gives you a
> chance to say that you're listening - and IF you have an opinion on the
> current alternative scenarios, to state it.
>
> If you do not speak up (by either choosing or by telling us different) then
> the IESG/IAB have no idea how to read that silence. So please do respond,
> and if you do not have an opinion or have not yet had the time/energy to
> evaluate, please at least show us that you saw this poll request, by
> answering the first question.
>
> So please - take a look, and tell us that you're listening.
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/poll/admin_scenario_alternatives/>
>
> Thank you!
>
>                    Harald, for the IESG and IAB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf