Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports

Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com> Sun, 07 August 2016 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE3212D5A8; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqizGH7e9cHn; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E8F12D740; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w127so227588702vkh.2; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 15:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2+xOL8V2Uf0hodvMvUhrN3QhxdZRohtPCbsuzJrGf+M=; b=oS7Auy4ypovL0r8cojQ5iJFDvhspjzrv7ogRG9kbkaapMIouFCu5GoG+6isX4PM2rn CzwWh9eFF21rUdCzBlqMJNgXp6ItEGQYDwvxLE0sK9eu70938EAWUjeS+uPz++EYWEc/ 37uFESNYMp7KtrIduipct0dU6SUwZ8Rb5nPUTi/PfYNV6a0laD6crk32Pgl/0Cg2w3el Qb7ysdvHOlJASY8kIIU4v6AjoqkPARY8YnM043UMPIr0WMFOwy7dokOOVdZXdX5qQixC jt8IHFVuzvOw1G+EFEeLEwEwEAmn2o7joDNzx3SJPZ3jggfeGufT21cLFNgm/mHfx0Z2 izsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2+xOL8V2Uf0hodvMvUhrN3QhxdZRohtPCbsuzJrGf+M=; b=IXUiHthogPwen8Mn/5fRJ6OORflg7kCuyCzjWVDxm29CEGzIIbwI9YVP+rf4C2gPRV 4Po7Mhksx8yZVp9iZW92Ohv6eVdrCIRJdzEtjopZ1NglDHQc4u2GhDAPf0febLzriOie GmttnZGU/b+pzFC1QJqaFXVWD/7VA5VFudrQ35EJA6S7AYP+fUOh6J1QA7PT8AeTtVfR cQCZf1B+UCnuD69v6MVqiTlCfYfNmkxr4047+ZzdiSST1yzbSP8+sBY1CyBcVnXkORg8 KZixSJPDdPxVmR1LbURLUz5dfNd+BalnXhjyvf5Q/JmKlncC5yRAcRfk92nYFDeabBwx BeAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutQf+JHqqATqzTw6d6rLdqtbAceCxHy1Wg8jBxAlZpP+E7YJO6o4LBh0LXWivMCKvj1Tca7Jeu/Z4pe7g==
X-Received: by 10.31.69.87 with SMTP id s84mr3281579vka.146.1470608565799; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 15:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.4.78 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.176.4.78 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ad0d3aa9-326b-5c1f-cc7b-2bd3f46ae57d@alvestrand.no>
References: <CAP8yD=tyqViJQhNihPioxdGH8fP+eZ_Z4fwtzkTDrLxut1NmgA@mail.gmail.com> <51F4D053-22C1-4F0E-ADEE-CCAF48B931E1@csperkins.org> <45871F4C-2EE2-4185-B9EE-3D4E7F6E9D57@kuehlewind.net> <2FB5FED1-3C27-4692-A067-1FF1CB412BC1@csperkins.org> <ad0d3aa9-326b-5c1f-cc7b-2bd3f46ae57d@alvestrand.no>
From: Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:22:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP8yD=seBA0_xWzwWwRWBXWawZ9+agmQUxoab8J57F9yP8bv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114dbd282b1613053982bdc0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BHSy_9AH_EQhKqiHYtN5pg3PU98>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, amankin@salesforce.com, "Mirja Kuehlewind \(IETF\)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports@tools.ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 22:22:48 -0000

All sounds good to me. Thank you, Harald and Colin.

On Aug 7, 2016 17:30, "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> Den 04. aug. 2016 14:07, skrev Colin Perkins:
> > Hi,
>
> >> What’s about the following?
> >>
> >> "For transport of media, secure RTP is used.  The details of the
> profile of RTP used are described in "RTP Usage“
> [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage], which mandates the use of a circuit breaker
> [draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-17] and congestion control (see
> [draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09] for further guidance).“
> >
> > No objection, but it’s not my draft to make the change.
> >
>
> This works for me. New section entitled "Congestion control".
> It needs to also mention that SCTP is already congestion-controlled.
>