Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 13 February 2009 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <timbray@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D283A698E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDWxUf17-3zL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE4C3A693B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so802894wag.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=KImMGxM7kpOXGgcu+Ze3MWQjPLZD7TJvBQHa+5lqkhg=; b=u8SIMptBTtnxhjFHS/BWFDFKM7EoV0R6LcBmq2/iLzNCSXtFTnyioiMQWdBhwR/LNz bLRgN6lPPrtgWM4WDPMumJYndl6wjhe8iFJsQWbrh3ZhCviWXpPGA/U5+CzcIB8+kvgC YGr7hAiOPu6D972X2VbkXfg+osQ4UmgQM5pAI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vo+CCwlUwaYxjQH6zsKdQojZfpfd7jkoYPMVt0pIqLdyh/rdfeXtVtj0PuOS1RBBZ+ 1/ncE2Ga78qZ0UpFh10uROt07idMKhLHynPavVFvZP3KE+musyUmJLzdFEmUAwrtIhFp WVSZGuyTskx5STnhvWWRJrynmmh6n/bwY62iY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: timbray@gmail.com
Received: by 10.115.94.1 with SMTP id w1mr1035746wal.177.1234563067980; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20090212233148.D779D6BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20090212233148.D779D6BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:07 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6f39c512c3822466
Message-ID: <517bf110902131411s3c995e22seddfdaf9c2acf766@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163649a7411eac510462d41d27"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tbray@textuality.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:11:03 -0000

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>wrote:

> I've heard from a number of the FSF thundering herd people to the effect of
> 'but the announcement says send email to ietf@ietf.org". (They're
> conveniently ignoring the fact that it says "the IETF community" all over
> the
> place in the Last Call, but never mind.)
>
> So clearly we need to change it to say something like:


For the record, I strongly oppose this change.  The problem seems neither
very common nor very serious, and the "solution" seems unduly complex and
likely to result in unintended side-effects.  -Tim