IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: ADV : money

"Robert G. Ferrell" <root@rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov> Wed, 14 July 1999 13:20 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id JAA08543 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:20:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov (rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov [136.177.164.192]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA08377 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov (rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov [136.177.164.192]) by rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA22936 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:11:14 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199907141311.IAA22936@rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:11:14 -0500
From: "Robert G. Ferrell" <root@rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov>
Reply-To: "Robert G. Ferrell" <root@rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov>
Subject: RE: ADV : money
To: ietf@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-MD5: +o6bshHvHfJ4M3gwNYSYbg==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4m sparc 

>From: MUNISH VERMA 2418 <MUNISHV@sabrepacific.com.au>
> how come these type of things are entertained. It must be avoided.

I wholeheartedly agree.  However, quoting the entire message and sending it back 
to the list for (at least from my perspective) the fourth time is _not_ a very 
effective way of avoiding it, IMO.

RGF

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
Robert G. Ferrell
Internet Technologist
National Business Center-Texas, US DoI  rferrell@nbc.gov
***************************************************************
private static class NT extends DOS implements Nothing {
***************************************************************

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status