IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B89120832 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:54:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NczcSTw9vWGJ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD1B120845; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:54:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xA4JqVBk003348; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 19:54:54 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=wC2RT3VHmJkDJri1I1G6Q55io9ssM0+q9isjg0HhIME=; b=hciL0OgeHz2H9PXzfWlPoQV3FSisJUjzZ0YRWVG13QaJwRu8karPYKm8b1R8U7UpiGCx s51HcEfKydyG0Q5Uw/Fn+YkJ0EtwBrTV1g9gaRk7Lu6VuxZHqNej+bYlj9veOkjhfmCj T61O4bHGwR4C37MZzzF4hOR7kqR2HLsafJ9ts9VWcYUmmCSyTltZxlklNt8wLnGHKQAT 0Z3cN9FCiyckf7KgoEOnVPR+zE4layAX5dwpZoqFI4yodSQ/4EuAeuDm3kEny+V1oXnf b79hOBx3y4iIwq07mfo7c6wks6x5qZhGC8sYdcxdIGGVQuMD24YecCZ5GA8IDqCilR73 Rw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w14yshjr0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 19:54:54 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4JlkHW030866; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:54:53 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2w154whw4g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:54:53 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:54:52 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:54:52 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
CC: "nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org" <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
Thread-Topic: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
Thread-Index: AQHVkllZtlByHExQzkS7nb/noDw4vqd7Ei2AgABDYACAAAVVgIAAZu0A//+s7wA=
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 19:54:52 +0000
Message-ID: <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8F025D06BC6CBE4B84F4E6C5E14D3BC8@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-04_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=936 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040189
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-11-04_11:2019-11-04,2019-11-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=918 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040190
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BP3LKcVvZFntsgg5GOfjgXyBVlc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 19:55:06 -0000

I wonder what people think would break if we moved to 5 AD's per area, and they could divide the WG's and IESG concalls amongst themselves?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email