Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143812D7CF; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHyhc-Pxru-z; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E797412D7EF; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k23so135367637oih.0; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ppAVOQvaqawdBJH/klGsk+wySdNsg+g4d8VXdn2YZjE=; b=kMVU9rjCxSYMlgeM5/8doT9qraQnfCClLJur9Dceq9GMywwZIPHcTH1F2HPV2dRPzv r1NqzwJcmWkFhDFuC8f2G3BVfbyknj8fEaWg7p2TmR+AS5/bqhVa/kqz3nWWYjpLbSgX 6FvfDpRItcVJo2nMk4Z4gyi6dNbvY5ifV8g4fyRzMtf+ZbRTwF4qYfnj0d+2e6vGz7wg eda0m7ivN5DBBvkvEgSr1zvbPOr9WDa4HJRKDyiuzTuCgyeX3s7V0DAh0a0nnNbzxaLj FFV5TTq9Uxavn7hsZ3UOj7nRCFHuFYhbo8aOzr+9sgeFPq0lrroEHzNZ3OLm/DAz4kK/ VxYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ppAVOQvaqawdBJH/klGsk+wySdNsg+g4d8VXdn2YZjE=; b=nG892GJRiXkOV5Ok8pgi6yDrgoQZ16t26TVC4dyR/dGGvTsyuQQoWNiR5XLYunuBc/ wNTvc1z37sfSgtdiBFzpB8lEW2rIF/TjEDcn0ioUFwrEi4BP+M4kASUzMYw7b/SgNNZV bS7QlczCUyY+Et3bWbKoT24GI/pz/vyH1ZBNyJuYa3NGzUGw2LfqOp7b9vsZhgvIuJAg sOO0cBi+W4/hQRUk87+X3x11RfwzGBLCi24IR2u7T1K0sn45+yRxj9AY0AynENo0jMWf Vq9dgQ/JswJ/pdHJ/1p2FJiUBp3aeZer9Xafuny4UP/7PaPGM49+0pTnh73VIzXLZkmk meuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIcXg9UyYbeTr3x3wgNOVtcUFJxifmFybSuHI7Bf0xr+rTp8+c4wzFPpBOu7wTK7jnaFqAbG3yR2xKawA==
X-Received: by 10.202.215.86 with SMTP id o83mr6179021oig.55.1464283589338; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.195.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMB63Uv4O6M06Bt_KiTXoB6GUjizAeNpTOeQVExBgJBqYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d3c303171f80533c2178d
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BRA3znB4tW8tJHUhg3dJiCsNGw4>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:26:46 -0000

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Which doesn't say that Ted is wrong, but it says that his information is
> dated.
>
>
Fred,

You don't specify whether you mean me or Ted Lemon here, but I presume you
mean me.  And on this point, you are simply wrong.  I have up to date
information.

Presuming that someone whose assessment is different from yours has made an
error out of ignorance is neither polite nor appropriate.

Ted Hardie