Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88594129B18 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:28:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9CBqDnr0Wug4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0CB129B1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:28:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1486564088; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=C43+uNZg19yfo4S0BxBLjDakpg6FlNuQ4ECgkdSPUyc=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=gxnDkZJ0MRAnZUP1Nult7/2oe4mefGkiFGHXZ9AtUrOAzkOW7fOg0Jhbud+/pN+zZi5xQC ygrsJsXRQbd6lTj0us7DTFGGWmmnpxxJcEOTzx1zwV5oMbPN6B9RdoIhPS6N0/kQMvlS8Z 8bUwwHKJS8Ja1EttzXxGWKYqiVMV7X8=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <WJsq-AA6wymW@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:28:08 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <3b955910-12d0-2c56-0dc2-30279f98aea5@isode.com> <19fabdd7-77c5-fc13-616e-26d39d2f23df@isode.com> <20170208142241.GB84460@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <217b1d1b-adba-2ebb-30ca-600f8dc77246@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:27:50 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20170208142241.GB84460@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BSZWVcQ63bRipQGVKmfBpH3YjGw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:28:14 -0000

Hi Andrew,

On 08/02/2017 14:22, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:52:00PM +0000, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.
> Isn't that exactly the complaint?  Something like, "Long periods of
> co-existence need to have lots of benefits or an existential one, or
> else they're not a good idea."
They have slightly different audiences. People who want to do something 
like JMAP are already doing something like JMAP. They might or might not 
care about IMAP. People who are doing IMAP and not webmail might not 
care about JMAP.
It is not yet clear to me that JMAP will replace IMAP. But I don't think 
this is a reason not to let JMAP progress.

Best Regards,
Alexey