IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Tue, 13 January 2015 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA91ACE50; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:58:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zO2lCoo3BhSR; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8371ACE4B; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-7) with ESMTP id t0D9wNo0032496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:58:23 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id t0D9wNMq032492; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:58:23 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:58:23 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <cnst@NetBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <54B4764C.6080106@NetBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1501131053020.18863@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <20141231153045.2584.87794.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20141231153045.2584.87794.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54B0DE42.5010103@NetBSD.org> <20150113003055.GB30295@1wt.eu> <54B4764C.6080106@NetBSD.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BT2K_4t6E-H0Ejd8rm-haIzdwe8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:02:21 -0800
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iesg-secretary@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:58:31 -0000

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:

>> Please note that the protocol *does* support http:// address scheme

> Has this been changed since the publication of 
> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2716278, which claims that it's 3 out of 
> 4 major browsers that will only do HTTP/2.0 with TLS?

1. That's an article on an unrelated site, not a product from the IETF. Basing 
HTTP/2 spec commentary on that seems like the wrong approach. Read the spec 
and base your critiques on that please.

2. On this list we have seen spokespeople from two browsers state this intent 
of implementing TLS-only. I personally am interested to learn which that third 
browser is since I wasn't aware of anyone publicly speaking for Safari's 
stance on this?

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email