Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03

Jouni Korhonen <> Wed, 04 January 2017 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4DD129615; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:24:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen <>
To: <>
Subject: Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:24:04 -0800
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:24:04 -0000

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2017-01-04
IETF LC End Date: 2016-12-26
IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19

Summary: Ready

(I did review the -00 version and my comment have been already
addressed in -01)

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 

For the consistency Section 1.2. Author's note should probably be also
tagged and explained how the RFC Editor is supposed to handle it. I
assume Section 1.2. will be removed from the final publication.