Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

[Greg Skinner <[e-mail]>]

If it is not too late, I would like to request that RFCs 1287, 1380, 1550, and 1752 also be moved to Historic.  1287, 1380, and 1752 are referenced in the draft (1550 is referenced from 1752), and concern the replacement of IPv4 with (what would eventually become) IPv6.

Please see the following link from the sunset4 WG for more information.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU>

Greg

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:15 PM, The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
>  <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
>