IAB volunteers

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48E12D1D7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.216
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=MGFogItE; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=RYkn4ExB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ez_zO9dQ0PXw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A55B12B05A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4Q8xr7G011730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 May 2016 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1464253205; x=1464339605; bh=w83kaj6mVx9x/chounk9IbBzMAHQylWwz63qZwVG9AY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=MGFogItEQtsMPpDetFX+uKGTpQG7+bzXOkqYzr0Ig59d/5GB2IMWIh3i+OSNbcJDz KKRyieWi+B2ccIkMA+wMtIwv9/XCV+O+/B6kBa9AtQWnIwLjBDolc1H24MVHTGXPwg 2U5NsxJjQdIqwCaPTf3d0sqQZf7drLkx3Lvy0PRs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1464253205; x=1464339605; i=@elandsys.com; bh=w83kaj6mVx9x/chounk9IbBzMAHQylWwz63qZwVG9AY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=RYkn4ExBBVY9ywyzWy8T8GdAMutrXNlqnOUyI8w7fE6l80bnCelCyGobOizEMaD5q KtHwiw3QBkpKgXQv4GhMs8BuGFtLZ03/yw1EhG7WtPn1FJV0yHPKoQzfEo77O9xQfi NU2NEANE8yqnhn2V/w7zIBvOOlyg+H0Y4eWuklLA=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 01:56:06 -0700
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: IAB volunteers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BYf0GFZzH9lwKB83q80xjEdx60Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:00:09 -0000

Hi Ted,
At 11:10 25-05-2016, Ted Hardie wrote:
>A same sex male couple attending the IETF in Singapore will  break 
>the law to have a normal family life.  Suspending that life for a 
>week may have no great important or lasting impact to some; for 
>others it may mean they cannot attend except remotely.  That latter 
>choice may have an impact on what jobs they can do for the IETF and 
>may have an impact on their employers' view of their work.

I understand that giving a person a choice about whether to break the 
law or not is a problematic choice.

There is a message at 
from the IAB about a volunteer to serve on the ICANN
Technical Liaison Group with the following requirement: "The ICANN 
TLG is expected to meet in person at or around the three ICANN 
meetings held each year".  Would the inability to attend, for 
example, an ICANN meeting for the reason I mentioned above be a 
disqualifying factor?

S. Moonesamy