Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 03 March 2017 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BECE129687; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:14:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.46.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148853969059.10129.17212682561343470544.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 03:14:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/B_cavt4xB2qBpzyEs3CrcMLKT18>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion.all@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 11:14:50 -0000

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-03-03
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-21
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16

Summary:  This is a well written document with two very minor nits.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 

1.  Introduction
....
   exploited in the attacks document in [RFC7258] and the threats
s/document/documented/

=======

EDNS0 ought to be expanded.