Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 14 July 2016 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3623012D0AD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=Gcr1NL8c; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=KbYOqiIB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLW1d_0T9i9I for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8112B00E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.34.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6EGOt7O009706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1468513508; x=1468599908; bh=B6UEWEo/FIGE+gcNv7x8jyk+gd1+N6lS+eSPQvn6t2U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Gcr1NL8c09NOHyNkApJqhDIu4wcowy4Uo0EqSXoJBS4UxFZFsLERwmr7HKMmR85IY uJM38Kpj5bjJ2l4N+ircN1NR2I53SW7gDJ1Pmp/EwFeoCkMfymgPp/uAnjR7CtBqge 1oPepD46JcSS/MVvLvN5yQH/TBCW9b3aRY2Yru/c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1468513508; x=1468599908; i=@elandsys.com; bh=B6UEWEo/FIGE+gcNv7x8jyk+gd1+N6lS+eSPQvn6t2U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=KbYOqiIBPU9HeUA8lW/pjI7WMOI3zSJsO5BmlXnjjl5zvf9rQ2uEXpD+rMH9fRVfE u0FwWKHsBNcDgQhtT1dOggXRCLoxZ0NYl3l5tDNgXtEcx35N8yYBrVF455pThgdXv4 r42BfdMojgEcy791e0sA9CBACaizBeYKltchUpk8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:15:38 -0700
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
In-Reply-To: <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org>
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk> <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Bb7VTSC-y0GFsyFBozNAH1n_9lk>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:25:13 -0000

Hi Tobias,
At 04:17 28-03-2016, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
>Yes. The comment period is ending soon and we will be reviewing the 
>responses to the call for review and getting back to the community 
>at that time.
>
>Thank you all for your feedback and input. Please be assured, we are 
>of course and indeed reading the ietf list and your comments and 
>will be including the input together.

I read the above reply in March.  The IAOC Chair wrote "please be 
assured" and yet I have not receive a reply to the questions.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy