Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 16 January 2017 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890C11295FC; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxXlZ1M3P0En; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x244.google.com (mail-qt0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FB612947E; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x244.google.com with SMTP id f4so15797376qte.2; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=UxnWFR6hIbYBrjXuHKVxY1iiLYObkPLq4qDToqFSQVY=; b=XjOrXZkrlvwqd2SA8AECdMFgp4tYGCY39Sq+6GIXU2GJaf30G7FC0CskRaA4GsoiGo lbwmQep8s8nspbIAPO9EgSFda6ugwD0qxwmZ+vN3D+HqoAw9Bvvq1gAYpvPhHGgezSr5 CtWTuA8pIxnTJgHA/8ZmKytqMjUaY87BmChuBqky7QTqjaUvUuZZHAoCTWgBuMUDfM2j DHCDuWDk1csW9PogYG4cGv6trMfM2dunOrcwi6yKfOgy4/POQuqi/6N5iYX5os2Nt2gC bWekZfiXZNaR0x6cVOqdOpMVWHgB28G3l5DTuf6YlrdyehpoQxAN+KihhuK1vgY1fch0 EHrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UxnWFR6hIbYBrjXuHKVxY1iiLYObkPLq4qDToqFSQVY=; b=sSOoz4d1so8P0Q/Nt/LKsXUhmvjONGYlUAVoF1eaOWszA1c4cVrRrEFajwsO0zC1AQ 3odwxCJF5UAMW5WLffxRPGPaNsqapJQxpD0yC/HW7dVequK9zdI5fU4pQkIX1gf362GB hUSyOVg0DEpVxuERlTmhOTn1QL3Xh/AFzoXClFPapnq0OsB8CQszV10kHeJfikr0CXb0 mbxGmyOdDICCLFFGuR4dGLHPWm+3Z3YdJd9pD3+Vfk6LwBxzo7sWQmV+vTf/5oPoX6A+ udDfG4PPkro/NaYyI7dLKLRtohPPBlOuQMjaEUyiiAaqmY/LWJRJG0AXHOI39bL2ZZ2x aweg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL1YGEMR+xY1dNNDMBpfcysuxfMieEK9+/wGsYN9vmYaV53QSrOy76BBev6njsaZfHSMFczSJi6YIZoag==
X-Received: by 10.55.3.14 with SMTP id 14mr30204048qkd.86.1484591401951; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.60.29 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <aa77b225-1b21-403e-5834-cc65f5b29d04@earthlink.net>
References: <148372972401.17454.8580929833890158319.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2cb3f151-f2c3-539f-fcc4-a40f64916bee@earthlink.net> <aa77b225-1b21-403e-5834-cc65f5b29d04@earthlink.net>
From: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:30:01 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: i_yQpb4i2LO5SBBTJqWJ6RQEPNA
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqctEL7L172nKP5AN_YMP-drm4vtDD4FH0vNRynXUpV4Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03
To: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Bck3jSI6krxUdKj6xX3LqhmP7KQ>
Cc: Tatuya Jinmei <Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org>, dmm@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids.all@ietf.org, "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:30:04 -0000

At Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:22:56 -0800,
Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Here is an updated description of the IPv6 address type when used as a MNID:
>
> > 4.1.  Description of the IPv6 address type
> >
> >     The IPv6 address [RFC4291] is encoded as a 16 octet string containing
> >     the full IPv6 address.  The IPv6 address MUST be a unicast routable
> >     IPv6 address.  Multicast addresses, link-local addresses, and the
> >     unspecified IPv6 address MUST NOT be used.  IPv6 Unique Local
> >     Addresses (ULAs) MAY be used, as long as any security operations
> >     making use of the ULA also take into account the domain in which the
> >     ULA is guaranteed to be unique.
>
> Please let me know if this resolves your concern.

Looks good to me.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya