Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Wed, 04 March 2009 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E52628C18F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.643, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEiEPEZTVui2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD063A68F6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D5A02FEA3FA; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:59:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:59:02 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Subject: Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems
Message-ID: <20090304145901.GC6574@shinkuro.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903041400220.8701@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903041400220.8701@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:58:36 -0000

[It seems to me that this discussion needs to happen in dnsext, so
I've added a Reply-To header to that effect.]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:09:22PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> 
> RFC 3484 needs to be updated to delete this rule

May I assume that we'll see your I-D specifying the change as soon as
possible, then?  (I appreciate that it's a little late for a -00, but
maybe after the queue re-opens?)

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.