Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 01 April 2021 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A123A0ECE; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pD5NByxT8MDa; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898853A0EC4; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.150.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 131CeZfF026211 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1617280847; x=1617367247; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fiISIpOT4kkaB2cDqMJ98T8lfrON8UOCLEEP0/OFDY8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=iSryfuWfnayFDRfBO4bSWD7UO4SRqPxWhyRHnBqY8vckAQBOiMegVE81yhUcM+wq3 SAaOAYOCw1L7jGyw2quXVYdg/E/BkRVsF8Pg/TObD9aqzoUTM1d8Ijn3ciAONnvqy6 xGnug0Rxh9aZ/9Fp0x8juN9AeZJr5S/1LJbrMtDc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210401053901.0d2c8570@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:40:01 -0700
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F3FFC378-C5C6-4D07-8843-E0C544DEB57E@eggert.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20210401013907.0b3b7fe8@elandnews.com> <F3FFC378-C5C6-4D07-8843-E0C544DEB57E@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BlzonckKdtsXDjYsDaHgxFXb9q0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:41:03 -0000

Hi Lars,
At 03:02 AM 01-04-2021, Lars Eggert wrote:
>I don't see this ambiguity, but I'm happy to change "informational 
>recommendations" to "recommendations", if that is clearer?

Yes, thanks.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy