Re: BCP97bis
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 17 October 2021 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE3E3A0474 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTAreOjZUcPG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BFB73A045E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id k26so13064493pfi.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nlp4eoPOuQ2zlLu5bOs5Ai+/aDEDLqIsMIDd7FlG7Z4=; b=WlYs4n0w8UmNppiui0c3zfqaHGYPIVaBIbv1pJrRsreyUY+lfzYnfQBkS/bofrMzwG qcCCPBCxbGlWQF57c/JbiYWaqPGzDh3xp/MkeKLVXhfKkR4/CTe4XL5R+edpSnlYdS+3 alLflgZjhB7uagSmdlK9/DmP2jx0yNsXVE5J0Z95VQKIU7npCEdXM6j+oYWjbwVQL+PC 95d3Chd2v6V7+36ZckeBObH7J8hugPwnbJqszvUQsuHuNtZGLTk550Yvi/XA4HeJ3RV+ nz84OFb8otQFzj1hBEGS7b/O21ZhT8VyALu40WIHWKU8giZiayAL9d6kpAHgfIWzEpfh 3B0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nlp4eoPOuQ2zlLu5bOs5Ai+/aDEDLqIsMIDd7FlG7Z4=; b=BGmWuhw4m7s+kInym5n8R6aqnKmePce8hhaTO1GQITmxpivYOGstcwjALbwxJ9MK85 Rk0zpMaRITEcUBM73YQoZarr90xhHFOVGhZMy4VAhv3JBWeVI3szBEt6Soditr6HktK/ 7YVJZeAzZdXHSgTOmIHcAmmMoITuInai14cMmIR6pKxnWLFpyTNlvDu2MR0ZnJBDiuxw Xb+OJO/cuElBPvF01lL8MbdyYAWYSm1tzhR78d6k/qv3+cQ/8io2bmd7bfWdHvUpbqf5 p026YTft48W+YuV3jrUpaRG83+BmnF4isS/lWzT7/1hYeUs4TAKI4W9XbJ4IRzDB6L2F I9uA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lZkFp2hdtjKhzGU+S3TQ+oeuNv76YEX+ZcJHwpqegmJXGFxFn jK2fHc+R3m7VMj4GwT7/LkA5VETYh3h16w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdgR1TI19kTKS/OQx20skNnIMRv/+olCCQAbfQ/k+MBcFsI8zHRkZlO4xF4z55I137MBG4jQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:248a:b0:44c:ecc5:a165 with SMTP id c10-20020a056a00248a00b0044cecc5a165mr23879900pfv.43.1634500236498; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:102d:e801:db7:d041:a2d:ce65? ([2406:e003:102d:e801:db7:d041:a2d:ce65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f84sm10813139pfa.25.2021.10.17.12.50.34 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.c om> <C657F78F-FF99-4898-8A08-844B32589DDE@vigilsec.com> <CAL0qLwbLqyWSqFGL2x-FpXXD19QG9-eZkrnTVm_fxt3tUfZSgg@mail.gmail.com> <C92D456E-63ED-453B-8F33-3AAECA40D1DA@vigilsec.com> <27721119-D39D-427D-8EEE-C5027DA15B06@akamai.com> <007c01d7c2dc$9090c780$b1b25680$@acm.org> <A7AD43FD-0117-44E7-9AB2-CDE3CB8682E1@akamai.com> <7FD4ED52C043B31F774E9381@PSB>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7d8b1f0f-1230-0fc3-cf90-a2a0bdc826a6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:50:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7FD4ED52C043B31F774E9381@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BuFYn7ZXEDfz_F3po_pNonKOb_g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 19:50:43 -0000
On 18-Oct-21 07:04, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Sunday, October 17, 2021 17:13 +0000 "Salz, Rich" > <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> * To make a stable reference in an unstable world, add a >> date. >> >> Or add text "retrieved on xxx xxx xxx" like Wikipedia >> often does. > > That makes it clear what is being referenced, which is good. > Absent other provisions/ requirements, it does nothing to > guarantee that the content will be there when someone goes > looking for it years (or decades) later. Indeed. I've used that formulation in academic publications, and in my mind it's an abbreviation for "I apologise if this citation is no longer valid when you happen to look for it, and I would have preferred a properly archived reference but I was too lazy to find one." Which isn't really good enough for a normative reference in a standard, of course. Brian
- BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis David Farmer
- Re: BCP97bis Brian Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and Informational-as-Standard Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis Joel M. Halpern
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis John Levine
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis tom petch
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- RE: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Lars Eggert
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Scott O. Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Sandy Wills
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael StJohns
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Randy Presuhn
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Erik Kline
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy