IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation)

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 25 December 2015 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918B21A90DC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:56:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fndUA_8YcYxO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6782C1A90DA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB158DA00B1; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([169.254.4.19]) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.235.67]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:56:06 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation)
Thread-Topic: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation)
Thread-Index: AQHROfCb9zLPa1q/Ek6qcVf9e/qLe57R9MuAgAK9EoCAAZ1dAIAAZWiAgAAWX4CAADB5AIAADEQAgAC8tgCAAIXQAIABB18AgAATOvuAAJD2gIAB95n7gACr4gD//6AP9Q==
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:56:04 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A0C6E0@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
References: <CAC8QAcf=yAAGVN35tUCpX38y6_qGstGhK4iYuyhK94LVWrz-+A@mail.gmail.com> <EMEW3|02dedadbe5e65aac9732e9359a7c2dberBHGjK03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E7D065D8-CADC-4A65-8AC7-6ECE9CF63D4F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAHw9_iKtck6ZSp6ofNFKLRj7-o3_UR42McTNQqsqCXfcduxAeA@mail.gmail.c om> <5674460C.1000107@krsek.cz> <4B81FA54-F79C-42CB-8024-1C653B0C9406@cisco.com> <20151218233645.GG3294@mx2.yitter.info> <56749EA4.6040801@gmail.com> <20151219000743.GH3294@mx2.yitter.info> <5676EBE9.8050304@dcrocker.net> <970B54F5-2422-4588-A95A-63E5144A8D35@gmail.com> <56789BBB.7020709@dcrocker.net> <4AE6DC68FC9B8CA113CBCDFA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5678D728.2080404@dcrocker.net> <5226A23C6E26B0350DE715AE@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <D6278A46-19AB-48D8-B55A-48FF51B7E0EC@piuha.net> <2508B3C2-8F5F-4417-8052-E73B6F34BED1@standardstrack.com> <567ACCEE.9030503@dcrocker.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A0C2DE@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <567B56A9.4030302@dcrocker.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A0C66B@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>, <567D8D4C.20004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <567D8D4C.20004@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [72.66.83.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BuQcmifD4SmIJymnE6znapTYEHU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:56:08 -0000

Brian Carpenter wrote:
> But they do not get published without review; it's just that the criteria
> are different, and sometimes the ISE says no. (Speaking as a member of the
> Independent Submissions Editorial Board, as a published author in the Independent
> stream, and as a co-author of a draft currently submitted to that stream.)

Correct, but they do get published without the review process that is used for IETF documents, and the process is quite nicely tuned for stuff that you want to publish without that review process.   I suspect it's quite a bit like the IETF review process was before it got to the stage Dave is complaining about, but since I never tried to publish a document during that era I can't say for sure.   I by no means intended to cast aspersions on the ISE process.

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status