RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
"Stefan Santesson" <stefans@microsoft.com> Tue, 28 February 2006 14:12 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FE5aD-0008WP-4n; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:12:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FE5aB-0008W9-JN; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:12:07 -0500
Received: from mail-eur.microsoft.com ([213.199.128.145]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FE5aA-0004PI-6Z; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:12:07 -0500
Received: from EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com ([65.53.193.197]) by mail-eur.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:12:04 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:11:59 -0000
Message-ID: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944044456EE@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AcY1ozyRgIGeYBvaRka9q6C9vLWfPgGzUA8A
From: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2006 14:12:04.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3B61D00:01C63C70]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Just to clarify this point. The text in the introduction where the authors retained change control was a leftover from the original draft that was intended to go informational. We simply forgot to remove this when we changed the scope to informational. This is fixed in version 03 of the draft. Stefan Santesson Program Manager, Standards Liaison Windows Security -----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] Sent: den 19 februari 2006 23:22 To: Bill Fenner; Steven M. Bellovin Cc: iesg@ietf.org; tls@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org Subject: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard I misunderstood the original question. I'll get it fixed or withdraw the Last Call. Russ At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote: > >Can we have a Proposed Standard > >without the IETF having change control? > >No. RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative >works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These >notices may not be used with any standards-track document". > > Bill _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Russ Allbery
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Strahm
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Peter Dambier
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Keith Moore
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Tony Finch
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Gray, Eric
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bernard Aboba
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Ari Medvinsky