Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Mon, 30 January 2017 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39F4129986 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNlNpLKau8jA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5C2129994 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v186so192267653lfa.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mi3KoEO3Hteg6HLhVoVs6zDp6HDVOq0X4VZY505K0eY=; b=NZRvI+LIbsEUHkeYjIfPy5SPGCUL+8apfgBUGy/arJLdWHzmQTQgLk5hlLm0BuoyMc Z9k7KjDqnJ5hcGYRADjCZLqV7nY0vDCyRJjHkfqoHPKTtkux6sijL0IWscHPu2Ua5R6o c9zjer6gv/ei5QL3Z/7NrSNFAxrgDGfg4ixgitMAlT3s54R7PfieNoCmbpHDZy7AozrF sNJKni7tPx5KsYfKMTugus6sN79zwy+bA2tQabDgJPBAaJd9AHR9LmRRVMEu127X2YH5 e3zViJyLBJERmEjAiNf81zk/mFUWHwy2jY5dUH+AJADCA3MvbY55zeUbGw9gNgD36Wtc KQmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mi3KoEO3Hteg6HLhVoVs6zDp6HDVOq0X4VZY505K0eY=; b=jj6rdc6W5r32dBnCwF0CqOR8u5ydd5TrMqmQWhWmbyoVetVx4MfZBz6V8QPNaJoUTZ 2O/+ptefVMzmelsNGAlhypY/NLHeDUxVt1G3y0IanXEbp4AQmBgYx0s9asqLC5POOkiq H+DOOjO0b/k8P7O2qorbQrCNd+KswulhfJEINg7YKanpQVhovbvmg/WloABpQh4LePlE kgFyQnsp6abbpt/8M+HVfNjXgmHqrZMbxjE8YHaxPwg+qDqrwy/1fAw3Kvo0lfFlIDvg r8oMi2I0d080jhiTWlo2fxJCSKLSR1GV2YAa3HSfrposANnrG2SZW22wCoepWHjseGzX e3sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ3KqBiPgHykutrWwzXiE0Csa0gzsCWS4xC+B0CBAssFseYb/vDuP/91JjlxiuBRw==
X-Received: by 10.46.71.203 with SMTP id u194mr7033156lja.7.1485773451018; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:6b0:7:1:6863:458d:b297:9108? ([2001:6b0:7:1:6863:458d:b297:9108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 96sm3637930lfp.18.2017.01.30.02.50.49 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAEjQQ5Vjs-vg6UQ9Oy0kb8VNEZHTbZnyHxeTCqVwPg4MjErsqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Message-ID: <6d5f47e2-ac98-f71a-a9cc-1b01cb972db0@mnt.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:50:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEjQQ5Vjs-vg6UQ9Oy0kb8VNEZHTbZnyHxeTCqVwPg4MjErsqA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/C7omVkR4NbVtvUtTK41Sy8tTavA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:50:55 -0000

> See you all in beautiful Prague, 
> 

I agree with RB - lets just stop meeting in the US.

US companies who still want to play will figure it out and
will apply pressure accordingly.

Feels like a no-brainer to me.