Re: Friday @ IETF61?
George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Thu, 02 September 2004 11:03 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA21844; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2pPv-00007B-Lq; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:06:12 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2pBo-0001Ut-Cd; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:51:36 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2p2g-00058W-Nk for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:42:10 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA20283 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cumin.apnic.net ([202.12.29.59] helo=apnic.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2p50-0006lr-Te for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:44:38 -0400
Received: from apnic.net (durian.apnic.net [202.12.29.252]) by apnic.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i82Afo8f021135; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:41:51 +1000
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:41:50 +1000
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Message-Id: <20040902204150.36058f73@garlic.apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B3452@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B3452@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Organization: APNIC Pty Ltd
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf)
X-Fruit-Of-The-Month-Club: persimmon
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AP-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.001 required=6
X-AP-Spam-Score: -100.001 (notspam) BAYES_44,USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.15 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:36:39 +0300 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote: >I do not believe that this is achievable. With the majority of other standards organizations meetings and industry events building their schedules on a week basis, avoiding major conflicts in the participants calendars would become an even more challenging task, close to mission impossible. I do not believe this is true. In fact, if no other body is using weekends, it only increases the chance that IETF can squeeze into schedules, because it can exploit dead time the other meetings cannot. I suspect most attendees do not share this exposure either. But almost ALL non-US resident attendees have borne this non-financial, social cost since the inception of a week-long, working-week model. -George >Dan > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]On >> Behalf Of George Michaelson >> Sent: 02 September, 2004 1:05 PM >> To: jari.arkko@piuha.net >> Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Tim Chown; ietf@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61? >> >> >> >> I call again for meetings run over the weekend. midweek to midweek. >> >> 1) cheaper hotel rates for attendees. weekends are cheaper. >> >> 2) less congestion in airports for flights. >> >> 3) for Europe and Asia, attendance in the USA becomes a loss >> of two weekends >> (one either side) and for the Americans, NO weekend. This >> would be fairer >> for everyone, and mean we had a cheaper, more productive time. >> >> -George >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> -- George Michaelson | APNIC | See you at APNIC 18 Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton | Nadi, Fiji Phone: +61 7 3858 3150 | QLD 4064 Australia | 31 Aug -3 Sep 2004 Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 | http://www.apnic.net | www.apnic.net/meetings/18 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Friday @ IETF61? Tim Chown
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Tim Chown
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Jari Arkko
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? George Michaelson
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Friday @ IETF61? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? George Michaelson
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Stig Venaas
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? George Michaelson
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Melinda Shore
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Melinda Shore
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Susan Harris
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Michael Richardson
- Re: Friday @ IETF61? Henrik Levkowetz
- POLL: IETFs Sunday-Friday or Thursday-Tuesday Henrik Levkowetz