The Friday Experiment
"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sat, 10 November 2018 09:14 UTC
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864C3130E11 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:14:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztAFDzE3K6v7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0871130DE4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id w204so5851696qka.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:14:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2iS0G4RsdjG2ANVc5CZVuFXU53QdM9RhicgIaL4HKWE=; b=P1+vi+HHV4c2PHwwSQLcBNxL/DuQDvnX22ER5TXfyhtAh/fZu8mrJVilti/1jw2AN1 KNTJba32CBHUBT5pW8lZ1MKw2VDGdVRI+dpXL9AwGQPjEAPSC0gs+KuVe84LwootFsAO xnTS2q1PwZiJrAqouoc6jRA7ck+UcL13L/loDEchoODeWUsWnmXhRrOyPfTwO0nZJurA RTj9lJ/XE1WO327YarvusGhcSS6ClMghiY6mvgrBoEwCr+eiLjBsrNSYopXyd8ou+2FR 74kaClsK6MKdCwNp2ERSfI8EwFYuESba1zd7UtdCf+h1n2En12mNKPElbPcOlqYRwTFX xmQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2iS0G4RsdjG2ANVc5CZVuFXU53QdM9RhicgIaL4HKWE=; b=n0SzS3V6afxh6vIBYsk/ApFJomMKcy/WpnEvHMDoUHl9LI8u+zNncANMNQ9+bfp/1v kZQIsw6aeGfJk3JcguMOYwjGX9wqaL2Y6N21fI8ghN09e1Wv816u4ruNriPx2ICW1Fwz fn1XBHThjtYMuUOFPxGor87fSMx8Yy+JWkoAwyLVzv2HjZ0krkBTsigftcaUvaJI8L8/ vm2GKTBJogVXQAvyPq7kXh7X1SrmSCALzFiC+ODg+YDntTYQJQBtZzE3IdWYsc0dEsPX CfU7OEMs2J59WFi95G5EDHwfgUnztVLOMG1xrcX3hbUR190I+FfZFvY8YJ2+jllHOTLB CB+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJdhTVDQWLS7XHn/dlIuLazSqXSIpkbJeJczN7wmn4yJgKkePZX U7TcyZ7IsvBEAHxw6Mm9nGx5MaQqM4XjdhcEG0Rny31i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fTl1fLgZjzmPMyWKlUArybNkqC5fKvWMic45dgR0jbu55aLiyBhRlGi6F9Aoqun1McjCgK5d8sTsOcRgmZrYY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3171:: with SMTP id h46mr11979270qtb.334.1541841296686; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:14:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:14:45 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3zuYXH58mpBs0wHDkz6=25At0ekV-1KKM-LTn=68c6WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: The Friday Experiment
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca04bf057a4be692"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CAEumgdqPB5jaZ2wAzcCC-tCBcU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:14:59 -0000
I would like to start a discussion on the Friday experiment. I, for one, thought that it was a resounding failure. Based on the room reservations in the meeting wiki, there were 8 rooms available on Friday, but only 5 side meetings, most of which were for only an hour or two, which was a huge underutilization of the resources that the IETF was paying for. The experiment also had at least two detrimental effects on the IETF agenda: - Many WGs had less time than was needed to address the topics or drafts that needed discussion - There were a number of unfortunate conficts, expecially in the Routing area. My personal hope is that this experiment will not be repeated, and we go back to our previous meeting agenda. Cheers, Andy
- The Friday Experiment Andrew G. Malis
- Re: The Friday Experiment Stewart Bryant
- Re: The Friday Experiment Leif Johansson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Carsten Bormann
- Re: The Friday Experiment Job Snijders
- Re: The Friday Experiment Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: The Friday Experiment Bob Hinden
- Re: The Friday Experiment Alissa Cooper
- Re: The Friday Experiment Stephen Farrell
- Re: The Friday Experiment Ted Lemon
- Re: The Friday Experiment Job Snijders
- Re: The Friday Experiment Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Ted Lemon
- Re: The Friday Experiment John C Klensin
- Re: The Friday Experiment Ted Lemon
- Re: The Friday Experiment Paul Hoffman
- Re: The Friday Experiment Jared Mauch
- Re: The Friday Experiment Carsten Bormann
- Re: The Friday Experiment Carsten Bormann
- Re: The Friday Experiment Loa Andersson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Michael Richardson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Michael Richardson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Yoav Nir
- reduce the number of WGs [was Re: The Friday Expe… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: reduce the number of WGs [was Re: The Friday … Jared Mauch
- Re: The Friday Experiment Lars Eggert
- Re: The Friday Experiment Russ Housley
- Re: The Friday Experiment Andrew G. Malis
- Re: The Friday Experiment Dirk Kutscher
- Re: The Friday Experiment Melinda Shore
- Re: The Friday Experiment Yoav Nir
- Re: The Friday Experiment Mary B
- Re: The Friday Experiment Aaron Falk
- Re: The Friday Experiment Stephen Farrell
- Re: The Friday Experiment Lou Berger
- Re: The Friday Experiment Paul Wouters
- Re: The Friday Experiment Ted Lemon
- Re: The Friday Experiment Lou Berger
- Re: The Friday Experiment Paul Wouters
- Re: The Friday Experiment Lou Berger
- RE: The Friday Experiment Valery Smyslov
- Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Lars Eggert
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Martin Thomson
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Jana Iyengar
- Re: The Friday Experiment Jana Iyengar
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Eric Rescorla
- Re: The Friday Experiment Job Snijders
- Re: The Friday Experiment Randy Bush
- Re: The Friday Experiment Russ Housley
- Re: The Friday Experiment Andrew G. Malis
- Re: The Friday Experiment BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: The Friday Experiment Michael Richardson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Dr. Pala
- Re: The Friday Experiment Carsten Bormann
- Re: The Friday Experiment Michael Richardson
- Re: The Friday Experiment Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: The Friday Experiment Behcet Sarikaya
- AW: The Friday Experiment N.Leymann
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Paul Wouters
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment) Ted Lemon