Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen@iki.fi> Fri, 13 February 2009 07:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jruohone@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D533A68D0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8eGZndSopkuB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAC128C121 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so891241ewy.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oISfpIAIScyqFyFlXFITMJ59YqUIxcHGNDDQO5FHcec=; b=J+dPKjMA7kxlq+zC+/lIsL0fRhgzvORPOauaC3p6/MSI+oA3RUYWQdZdVAEmZw6DE+ Tb8UlVFawDQyEaohl12pxaAPcESodfxIXMye9udYoSCwgiAhz7jt0ug0yU/hvaBOctSC TegzgNbhQ/gEaAB0HE23E7WzXwSZ7vm3i/Y0U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=mH0RcQVJ/waL2zZ/MzcgzNfDrhMj5xOZcwxbpMYbcl9bMpXH1TyvNBdsJJYVPFzsUE qeGr1E6bbVT66+GVWjw6ledxOTvD1E+cpJOkoEnEor3m+Azjj2YAHumsBo0tN5JeZPlw Xi1pfi1VLVhVlQNbdz/umoGB/2cNUqx3/skBo=
Received: by 10.210.137.14 with SMTP id k14mr1376742ebd.175.1234510461738; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marx.bitnet (nblzone-208-36.nblnetworks.fi [83.145.208.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm1247218nfh.35.2009.02.12.23.34.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Sender: a b <jruohone@gmail.com>
Received: by marx.bitnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 060EC16A8C; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:34:18 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:34:18 +0200
From: Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen@iki.fi>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
Message-ID: <20090213073418.GA6950@marx.bitnet>
References: <87bpt9ou7d.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <C5B8BAE5.30347%stewe@stewe.org> <87k57vlwfu.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <49941899.5010506@piuha.net> <87r623jt08.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B291@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B291@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jruohonen@iki.fi
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:36:17 -0000
On 12.02.2009, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > 3) Write only campaigns decrease sympathy for the position being promoted. As someone who mainly acts in read-only mode on this list: regardless of what one thinks about free software, I think what troubles me most in the recent campaign is that it has already been partially successful. This essentially political campaign has already disturbed the list. It has already provoked a vivid discussion. As has been pointed out, if campaigns like this are considered as qualified input to IETF, also input from other political pressure groups or professional lobby groups must be considered equally legitimate. This may show bad taste, but does ISO's OOXML ring a bell? - Jukka Ruohonen.
- yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-ex… Bob Jolliffe
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Stephan Wenger
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Simon Josefsson
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Stephan Wenger
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Bob Jolliffe
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-auth… Simon Josefsson
- IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: … Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Tony Finch
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Scott Brim
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Aaron Williamson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Tony Finch
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (W… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility TSG
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- RE: IETF and open source license compatibility Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility TSG
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Wes Hardaker
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Wes Hardaker
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Jukka Ruohonen
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Willie Gillespie
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Simon Josefsson
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Thierry Moreau
- RE: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and o… Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Scott O. Bradner
- (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility) Scott Kitterman
- On the best use of IETF resources with respect to… Paul Hoffman
- Re: On the best use of IETF resources with respec… Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility Brian E Carpenter