Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EC312962C
 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 Mar 2017 09:13:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.734
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.734 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id txO2VpqLutv9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2017 09:13:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FEF129616
 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 Mar 2017 09:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com (mail-yw0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.161.182])
 by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC6473A0A1
 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 Mar 2017 12:07:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d1so37504952ywd.2
 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:07:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mKMmnB7TL2xzIfR7V9rHIqFFpoXWuN5sT8RbEsopKQQL2EHDavMHmtV+QNe8KXliWJpewmHyMy7q1C3A==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.151 with SMTP id b23mr10893353qta.163.1488388032466; 
 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:07:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.162.65 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:07:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <14476.1488384266@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <14476.1488384266@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:07:11 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNo0x9mVeqc9a5yGbB6yKDnrQVgoKfq_Q8HSfpFv1BmJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNo0x9mVeqc9a5yGbB6yKDnrQVgoKfq_Q8HSfpFv1BmJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so
 shy?
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142f5c2f6eaf00549ae5701
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CD4zcm4ztidGynzu4DGIrLfj5OI>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:13:09 -0000

--001a1142f5c2f6eaf00549ae5701
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> For the third time in two days I find myself, when asking others for
> opinions
> about some text, pointing at github commit logs.  With the beautiful
> makefiles we often have, one can't even depend upon having a formatted .txt
> version there!


You can fix this with better tooling within github and travis integration
fwiw. Checkout the httpbis github https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
- you'll see the for each adopted draft the README.md has links to the
"editor's draft" in both txt and html as well as the working group draft.
The former is auto-generated on every push to the repo, the latter is a
pointer to datatracker.

I'm not arguing against updating data tracker more often - just saying this
'editor's draft' convention can work very well between official revisions
no matter the cadence a WG chooses.

--001a1142f5c2f6eaf00549ae5701
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Michael Richardson <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca" target=3D"_blank">mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca=
</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"=
><div class=3D"gmail-adM"><br></div>
For the third time <span class=3D"gmail-aBn" tabindex=3D"0"><span class=3D"=
gmail-aQJ">in two days</span></span> I find myself, when asking others for =
opinions<br>
about some text, pointing at github commit logs.=C2=A0 With the beautiful<b=
r>
makefiles we often have, one can&#39;t even depend upon having a formatted =
.txt<br>
version there!</blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">You c=
an fix this with better tooling within github and travis integration fwiw. =
Checkout the httpbis github <a href=3D"https://github.com/httpwg/http-exten=
sions">https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions</a> - you&#39;ll see the f=
or each adopted draft the README.md has links to the &quot;editor&#39;s dra=
ft&quot; in both txt and html as well as the working group draft. The forme=
r is auto-generated on every push to the repo, the latter is a pointer to d=
atatracker.<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I&#39;m not arguing aga=
inst updating data tracker more often - just saying this &#39;editor&#39;s =
draft&#39; convention can work very well between official revisions no matt=
er the cadence a WG chooses.<br><br><br></div></div>

--001a1142f5c2f6eaf00549ae5701--

