Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 11 April 2016 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D6912F283 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=ZJlshZCj; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=EY3z5ydO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e37C7RemiwVE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC3512F307 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC40921BE3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:33:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:33:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=gvGcEovVWsj243ne/mWppbh//CA=; b=ZJlshZ CjhOkAqK6zA/qv+oB/Oxg9SD0Nbyt+Qi7BCLLfaRBr3gVhKQKRFVjEOUdgh8Dc0q zOv/U2kWAc17UEQY/ikyQEay4QvSoVknNfLiUKW5UlQKb6HMbldZCMbPoXpnKyVP TDVt+qwwRy5przyFBnD9/w3PeNludmWlNg/kQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=gvGcEovVWsj243n e/mWppbh//CA=; b=EY3z5ydOtEt1iqlxZhHa5Vd1yjS7zJcgBxJ2R+YOKM8XkPN T+dNvEnP3CjVVef8jZRwp4lhJ7sVW9V/JJQm1Wv3T9xaSizyvmqAA5UBSLVXCP78 oq6ulGhipm//5ElDX+UDfR10LsbtzLO6E7VAHoiZrVfEpx3Bk7NqJ1U87Ck4=
X-Sasl-enc: vhy73sjcQ+H+/DlSMIR24QX2r0WAnO3gGdbCZ+Voy/ac 1460414019
Received: from dhcp-171-68-20-149.cisco.com (dhcp-171-68-20-149.cisco.com [171.68.20.149]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 363B9C00014; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:33:39 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <19FD9771-D4A1-4D1A-87BF-A11F2BEC3E6A@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:33:38 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D674EE47-9E29-4E03-9BC5-7BCA0AFD880F@cooperw.in>
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net> <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com> <F99F459688AAAFCDCD5D9CC1@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5702CBA2.2060802@gmail.com> <19FD9771-D4A1-4D1A-87BF-A11F2BEC3E6A@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CH47eJ3CFJMXdwDc8vMX09PNL5U>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:33:43 -0000

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Well, *exactly*. That's why I don't think that ADs or WGCs need to
>> be called out in any particular way: they participate and therefore
>> if they are reasonably and personally aware of IPR, they must disclose
>> (and if they can't disclose, they need to stop participating in
>> that particular case).
> 
> Right, and I think we all are actually in agreement over this.
> 
> Personally, I’d love to see the draft talk about AD participation just like it talks about other people's participation. If I really haven’t participated in WG X, well, I haven’t, even if my co-AD owns the group :-) And if I did participate, well, I should declare the IPR that I know of :-)

+1
This is what did not make sense to me about the draft. 

Alissa

> 
> Jari
>