Re: IETF 92 in Dallas!
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 16 August 2012 08:17 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F66D21F8578; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VeFYIRhkzpc1; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B69E21F84F9; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7CE25F995A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:e41f:b5e2:3b18:a3de]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA55A216C6E; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7E523A314B; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:17:29 +1000 (EST)
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20120815190455.14702.74089.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <618FF5D7-5351-468C-A08E-4C104B063D16@lacnic.net> <CAOmxzdzDmbZNRfRgdxps8JAiw9BGzti+aM_CvVONHLFjrboa=A@mail.gmail.com> <502C81D2.3020600@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 92 in Dallas!
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:14:58 MST." <502C81D2.3020600@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:17:28 +1000
Message-Id: <20120816081729.9F7E523A314B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iaoc@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, iesg@ietf.org, IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:17:57 -0000
In message <502C81D2.3020600@bogus.com>, joel jaeggli writes: > On 8/15/12 9:49 PM, Alejandro Acosta wrote: > > Hi All, > > In my humble opinion I totally agree with Arturo. So far I do know > > several cities in Latin America and I believe Sao Paulo (Brazil) or > > Cancun (Mexico) might be a good options. Of course there are many more > > good cities, those ware the first two that came to my mind. > > I hope IETF 100 can be done over there. > Notably Sao Paulo gets a train line from GRU in time for the worldcup in > theory, which would be a substantial accessibility improvement. > > Some locations in the southern hemisphere where attendees hail from have > even more painful routing than normal to GRU e.g. syd. The observation > would be that it's a long-haul for all but a handful of attendees. And it would be ~$1000 (AUD) more than Vancouver was from Sydney. SYD -> SCL -> GRU 21:40 GRU -> SLC -> SYD 24:30 > > See you, > > > > Alejandro, > > > > > > > > On 8/15/12, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> wrote: > >> So "Americas" was actually "North America". > >> > >> Well, it went the possibility to have one in central or south america, > what > >> at shame. At least until IETF 98 in March 2017 no IETF down the south of R > io > >> Grande. > >> > >> May I ask the IAOC, what are the impediments to have one IETF in Latin > >> America? > >> > >> Regards, > >> as > >> > >> On 15 Aug 2012, at 14:04, IETF Administrative Director wrote: > >> > >>> The IAOC is pleased to announce Dallas, TX, USA as the site for IETF 92 > >>> from March 22-27, > >>> 2015. The IETF was last in Dallas for IETF 65 in 2006. IETF 92 will be > >>> at a different venue in > >>> the Dallas Arts District. > >>> > >>> Those who may be interested in hosting or sponsoring this or any future > >>> meeting are invited to > >>> contact Drew Dvorshak at dvorshak@isoc.org. See Host opportunities > >>> below. > >>> > >>> Ray Pelletier > >>> IETF Administrative Director > >>> > >>> IETF Meeting Schedule: > >>> > >>> 2012 > >>> IETF 85 Atlanta 4 - 9 November Host: North American Cable Industry > >>> > >>> 2013 > >>> IETF 86 Orlando 10 - 15 March (Back-to-back with IEEE 802) Comcast & > >>> NBC Universal > >>> IETF 87 Berlin 28 July - 2 Aug Host and Sponsors Sought > >>> IETF 88 Vancouver 3 - 8 November Host Sought > >>> > >>> 2014 - Hosts sought > >>> IETF 89 London > >>> IETF 90 Toronto > >>> IETF 91 Honolulu > >>> > >>> 2015 - Hosts sought > >>> IETF 92 Dallas > >>> IETF 93 Europe > >>> IETF 94 Yokohama WIDE > >> > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- IETF 92 in Dallas! IETF Administrative Director
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Mary Barnes
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Arturo Servin
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Alejandro Acosta
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Mark Andrews
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! John Levine
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Tony Hansen
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Carlos M. martinez
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Arturo Servin
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! John R Levine
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Mary Barnes
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAB] IETF 92 in Dallas! Wes Hardaker
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! John C Klensin
- Re: [IAOC] IETF 92 in Dallas! John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! ... vetting of alternatives David Morris
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Michal Krsek
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [IAOC] IETF 92 in Dallas! Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Glen Zorn
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Ole Jacobsen (ole)
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Randy Bush
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Pelletier Ray
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Randy Bush
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Dave Crocker
- Re: much farther away than IETF 92 in Dallas! John Levine
- Re: much farther away than IETF 92 in Dallas! Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IETF 92 in Dallas! Michael Richardson