RE: Basic ietf process question ...
"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Sun, 05 August 2012 01:37 UTC
Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D07821F882E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.256
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.256 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.343, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsW63eQzLLRg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A5C21F8828 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAG/MHVDGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABFuT2BB4IgAQEBAQIBEigxDgULAgEIDQEHIRAyJQEBBA4FCBqHZQadcpwrkW5gA5tGig+Cew
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,714,1336363200"; d="scan'208";a="318556692"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2012 21:32:21 -0400
Received: from dc-us1hcex2.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.21]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2012 21:32:26 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.202]) by DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com ([::1]) with mapi; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:37:06 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 21:34:59 -0400
Subject: RE: Basic ietf process question ...
Thread-Topic: Basic ietf process question ...
Thread-Index: Ac1xoCIzv7OzK/YgQZOyNFu+lgjY1ABCmR5l
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0BF7@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <20120802055556.1356.17133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><CALaySJK6RE1pnk0RJZjpU8jHb9KKb3zOjGc5NqTcVyb7kTBOyw@mail.gmail.com><CAL0qLwZaoVDtt_8o1Qr5NqG-rBk6jkAMMVT+jUUoiD2rhEvmuw@mail.gmail.com> <501AA9DF.6010208@raszuk.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407E24713@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <501AB4F5.7030205@raszuk.net> <501AC2C7.6040707@gmail.com>, <270DDF46-AA04-49C0-B54C-35FD0AE0350F@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <270DDF46-AA04-49C0-B54C-35FD0AE0350F@mnot.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:37:09 -0000
> From: Mark Nottingham [mnot@mnot.net] > > What surprises me and many others is that people are still using it > and promoting it, when it's well-understood by almost EVERYONE who was > involved in using XML for protocols in the past ten years agrees that > it's a mistake. It sounds to me like what is needed is some sort of "best common practices" document regarding data aggregation and encoding, or even perhaps an IETF Sunday tutorial. Lots of people who are never going to become experts in the field need to make good choices when designing protocols... Dale
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-exte… Barry Leiba
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-exte… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Randy Bush
- RE: Basic ietf process question ... Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- RE: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Andy Bierman
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... David Harrington
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] Basic ietf process question ... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Mark Nottingham
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Martin Rex
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... ned+ietf
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Mark Nottingham
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... ned+ietf
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Mark Nottingham
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Martin Thomson
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Mark Nottingham
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Hector Santos
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... ned+ietf
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Mark Nottingham
- RE: Basic ietf process question ... Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Basic ietf process question ... Tim Bray