RE: Basic ietf process question ...

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Sun, 05 August 2012 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D07821F882E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.256
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.256 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.343, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsW63eQzLLRg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A5C21F8828 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAG/MHVDGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABFuT2BB4IgAQEBAQIBEigxDgULAgEIDQEHIRAyJQEBBA4FCBqHZQadcpwrkW5gA5tGig+Cew
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,714,1336363200"; d="scan'208";a="318556692"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2012 21:32:21 -0400
Received: from dc-us1hcex2.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.21]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2012 21:32:26 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.202]) by DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com ([::1]) with mapi; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:37:06 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 21:34:59 -0400
Subject: RE: Basic ietf process question ...
Thread-Topic: Basic ietf process question ...
Thread-Index: Ac1xoCIzv7OzK/YgQZOyNFu+lgjY1ABCmR5l
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0BF7@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <20120802055556.1356.17133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><CALaySJK6RE1pnk0RJZjpU8jHb9KKb3zOjGc5NqTcVyb7kTBOyw@mail.gmail.com><CAL0qLwZaoVDtt_8o1Qr5NqG-rBk6jkAMMVT+jUUoiD2rhEvmuw@mail.gmail.com> <501AA9DF.6010208@raszuk.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407E24713@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <501AB4F5.7030205@raszuk.net> <501AC2C7.6040707@gmail.com>, <270DDF46-AA04-49C0-B54C-35FD0AE0350F@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <270DDF46-AA04-49C0-B54C-35FD0AE0350F@mnot.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:37:09 -0000

> From: Mark Nottingham [mnot@mnot.net]
> 
> What surprises me and many others is that people are still using it
> and promoting it, when it's well-understood by almost EVERYONE who was
> involved in using XML for protocols in the past ten years agrees that
> it's a mistake.

It sounds to me like what is needed is some sort of "best common
practices" document regarding data aggregation and encoding, or even
perhaps an IETF Sunday tutorial.  Lots of people who are never going
to become experts in the field need to make good choices when
designing protocols...

Dale