Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Thu, 04 November 2021 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424AA3A0DA3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zA_tI8qeof0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10023A0D9D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id v64so15334907ybi.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=kscczC4md4WupefyZcPZn9xSXJIUFhifDPVclFmuTPc=; b=ZMwFV/iZOPJSBev+6jSC9TX3u9VY+e+hGCLJhQMOTB3jmf5rUaxxUbszFkTDUrTRjF wkvfOBPPyXn9yXHyq40Vid+yzEa3z4tgyt6mOrZ1N8kJgGKWGznpm94RwbCZECJovaU4 EBy5Vn7/iUFtGEtRok2WmvJtisZC0dYOE7QNAxawF8DRoB4dfmLBNcLbgimNfUBUfi7Z fYnU381HkZA9Zapevc9f49A2hv1+BPJcp6aXAPuwKKooGeWcrX/6L1H8hg/LN99M39FW HUxhRWyd8c+fG9zjuAPSU8gXSIiXlMy9ctZ1nOfk3TV4TnUfSypA5YZe/TKQ4YrTw63e fReQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kscczC4md4WupefyZcPZn9xSXJIUFhifDPVclFmuTPc=; b=C26lw3t/PKgpcE7rudRD7upzoFUMgW1wl4X1dweUBPg6K+jbT8ZSQ9S6EMpKaARdzy OdRE9AtXJTeex73j0hmT65zs+nzlnDvToLQU3vzoPjxOlTFFs7XdM6i+M7REXxhLWYPz Jd5aBtFlePpu6ITC0YSpQVLFMOz46fWQCuKY9neELldo+fN0wZlL5OgBSvcAJYJNpRcZ 9MAaGQ51aycrC+io8vf4bCJX/jCzmhFMmMkxRi6C3+SuhCeienCiJAMsXXt+kcR3dymo gKxl1/GfMlVkNcW7JrZ98Xy/hLk945VSmZ2pujqSQRz9xdHZ6/1hl4QUt7p6wsArUX4T gukQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334g3QVxJD5XDSbKvH8gM2Cnbb9K3OxvTle99CbeZ73J2AGFFI5 20bGa4JJOSOdd/KXJwpaV+5gXd3cDZwl0zjmA1TC3eP9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlj+M1aY13dB2lAozrVPHl9P+7rBYw8qCSoklIbDw1RgkIFiB5T6lhSyEUa6d9gZbs8+NTBQs8JwxzLGAwF78=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:15c5:: with SMTP id 188mr55028136ybv.444.1636039634642; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk> <746C1453-FFB0-46E5-ABF2-8630DC23B959@network-heretics.com> <c3e9fe1b-8e48-a364-9e25-4084dac70889@meetinghouse.net> <3a6bf8ad-5492-0942-a451-6317e8a93705@network-heretics.com> <3e685576-a230-a7c4-f371-d66a55aa820d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7a087707-499f-e3bf-8701-1a58930a8a22@meetinghouse.net> <4ec32d7a-a17b-635b-91bc-4152313d6800@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <885e62bf-7d6a-4501-a48a-e7c2cbf20382@joelhalpern.com> <e59adb61-a55c-7f5f-a60a-40bf186c139d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CAC8QAceMSrfkqGTYcMNr3JargO3gxJqTaEyf02LGHd-KVeUDHw@mail.gmail.com> <6286da3e-2beb-9556-089a-2e1951573b1e@gmail.com> <59c80b60-438f-b10f-ad61-ba839f6e4f95@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <e834916e85ea47ef94fce07c23928d2b@huawei.com> <37b299c8-e821-07e5-6240-68fb9d1ca137@gmail.com> <23b450fb11eb4a51bb4ee837b5c52657@huawei.com> <a805b50d-3ccd-dd2a-4931-6c6dc9a8ede3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <a805b50d-3ccd-dd2a-4931-6c6dc9a8ede3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:27:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBoMue+WU3YEzs4Qz4RCB=3=Q2p_tCdy=wiY0Ld9XcHCfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000042efd405cff829c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CQy1lqXNOcvjsBA2BA_koYGgl3c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 15:27:19 -0000

>
> Existence of running code for some specification means
> not that the specification is good but that we can
> operate and evaluate the specification to judge whether
> it is good or not.
>
>                                                 Masataka Ohta
>

This, surprisingly, can't be said enough. I've repeatedly heard the
argument that someone's running code is verification that the idea is
sound, and therefore the solution should be adopted. And I can rarely tell
if they are simply lacking any sense of architecture or if they are just
trolling the group to push their work. Either way, it's exhausting.

- Shep