Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF112D0C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGm3dow-LwrY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5788412DB2D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id eu11so32944538pad.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VEnla+3qf1edo/uJd3fa802J5Qj9nZSJCsKIxnlA/EM=; b=Z0t+oZyuTVDAH33qQ5Ofq5y/LVlUQXlr2DFnTtY95weNmcG7R+8wilNLNn56+wuX6m N1ay92pBRXPE7Vfa1HGWLkwMi6JQNuOXdCGMfVOcwNEoFI1SPFavZQxU29zZFPMNqo0I UKfRgDt9rHSn76Vxw+s1ecoEH4k9h5l1pTqUdYUqxRJ5wbUiXLPFPxw9Q4imS4JGbJps J71lAw0NWHAE1imRWOz064a61pQ6FPyrQhovarKNoiudMYk3jVngkzIT5mHhF36EG1D3 P0dgJaFhN70USHIi1RCGYZL4Mw3teKpSy/IobD2Xrvg+dkaoA7EQ+c37V2Qxmbt2bifo MkVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VEnla+3qf1edo/uJd3fa802J5Qj9nZSJCsKIxnlA/EM=; b=Z1+lxPW6sL4iEvRtCf9fdYbZSJRA6IrhluvENg6GiRgq5Vb5w55LDmXCZMKS8oGuVx 84yAIlnDRsZOo6hXL9+hFBd2rlmtDtmXdzPsiiGKvXsq7RmFCMUY96Wx+t43TUV4OK8t caBbz/loqafxilCse8+FWSHSegeQla+vZEsnVcRrbHYS8D9DFuH0P5zxS8kt2W4CcbXO hl0ztTK2/0FIYlKV9SqRwI8dHyhj7oFzxIlNNHBYGah4AlJNL0f8vpmLsiA3/veEMjNs JFOrlYVjogGjaUdyQ1VHn+nzosuf95l0+qasMaL0qacYrEUrue5tqdnE44uSvzDoJcH8 Cqqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL0Q+eAB122+eML8zRzRJfMifIa2S4Lsfyi+4+VFtrJZR6cfehL6KR2ouMSzm4w6Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.66.234 with SMTP id i10mr24667045pat.114.1464371668528; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (209-112-209-231-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.112.209.231]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id vw1sm29689875pab.35.2016.05.27.10.54.27 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 May 2016 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr2wyE8SVq_FBWvp5ipVNhqMDs0QnvyL7jJtbKKxCr3bGA@mail.gmail.com> <096736229B32B700FCB16703@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20160527171221.GA20298@gsp.org> <e6572c1c-486f-025d-2495-955f98bd976c@comcast.net>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d000c22c-d4b5-7dcc-2406-7fe630fd3105@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:52:58 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e6572c1c-486f-025d-2495-955f98bd976c@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CV5fjRGNHNqBBTuCn2LnVclgWwg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:54:30 -0000

On 5/27/16 9:46 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
> I would expect that we as an organization will continue to meet in
> person for probably the life of the organization.  We as humans are a
> social species, and, even with all the sturm und drang that's been on
> the various mailing list with respect to the meeting venue topics - at
> the end we will find more benefit than not to meet in person.

I think so, as well, but that doesn't mean that we can't
work to de-emphasize physical meetings - the choices aren't
between maintaining the status quo on the one hand or
completely eliminating meetings on the other.  (I know
you believe this as well this but it wasn't brought out in
what you wrote).

My own experience has been that it is possible to maintain
a good working relationship with the organization and to move
work along even while attending meetings sporadically, but it
does take some initiative on your own part, an understanding
of who to contact and how to contact them about various pieces
of work, and some sensitivity to remote participation issues
on the part of working group chairs.  Unfortunately the second
issue (an understanding of how to keep work rolling) does take
a bit of IETF experience to develop.

Melinda