Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Fri, 27 February 2015 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7211ACC82 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdUwdNjBF4NM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772971A88F6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so781675iga.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b1NnrkllBsC8zAiihnvAKCQsDOhQNG4DgIqEx29k5zA=; b=Rp8xduZ3zfyTH/naSucV5KfN4IF12fCyUuwpW2yp202QWfpXm0oieNu329dX7fjwZb eHTqfWBMsteYAbCwwkqAMYv4ejOY8eYkEN8I5EO2Mfdg5bckRC9hrwnuYplT9FTwrbEd LcgIMxyhdIsjPooBjZsi9uzrGqgNBs/z+gNp1bNL6Cwg60LXRZWqKE7ft3R1Q5znzgCB xwGSylmj//0z/odRwjZR0Ye1kGgBD708I+3imKPET8BStnR2jr0+lzwgFo+xdHPZBSk5 R7EQQDzcqMQAnymbexDJauWzHTaL0m771IjY/QdZ6pO2LsbtSzvnZHat2H15Q9oCwnLl aVQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnO1pGROiInFDYG42pvIZTBn0c/SSGysTJT7GRKV3MKWbhhd2gofPn6UE1kncgez1O/bURj
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.148.101 with SMTP id tr5mr4612092igb.12.1425048859885; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.120.6 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:54:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:500:4:15:e4a6:48c1:f627:57]
In-Reply-To: <39D5E26A-E1FE-4C77-9624-5E9396497F65@mnot.net>
References: <20150127223859.28024.43756.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4257D8A3-0EFE-40E3-B0AD-8E23772B7693@mnot.net> <CAAQiQRdLvcQLskOuo7g_=SfmowCtyyF7OwWb-Y0nsRDeTdgncA@mail.gmail.com> <39D5E26A-E1FE-4C77-9624-5E9396497F65@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:54:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRfODc3aygiYERdvkj40uVjm3Z2a5rxKCPZqSBeDxWa+Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134c7bc14db550510130b98
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CWb-BRwZZQMko34Ve8Jf0oHKXZc>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UGF0cmlrIEbDpGx0c3Ryw7Zt?= <paf@netnod.se>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:54:21 -0000

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Cool! Some quick feedback:
>
> * you should explicitly accommodate target attributes (i.e., extension
> fields)
> * 'rev' was only included in 5988 for backwards compatibility with some
> fairly esoteric use cases; don't think it's necessary or good here.
> * you need to specify how to determine the context of the link (using
> RFC5988 terminology).
>

Thanks Mark. Excellent feedback!
-andy