Re: DMARC and yahoo

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 21 April 2014 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CB91A0231 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdHhZ4QtTb78 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5B81A0223 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3LGihpU012735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:44:46 -0700
Message-ID: <53554A7B.20006@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:42:35 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC and yahoo
References: <20140421163621.29166.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140421163621.29166.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CWc9srltjTn2Rnv0XyCzMc5NZzs
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:44:56 -0000

On 4/21/2014 9:36 AM, John Levine wrote:
> They could fix it if they
> wanted, e.g., by arranging to whitelist mail sources that don't match
> DMARC's authentication model but send mail people want.  This is not
> just mailing lists, of course.


Sorry, but I'm not quite understanding what additional mechanism you 
have in mind.

Exactly who does exactly what?

Who has to adopt it?

How will it scale?


d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net