IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 13 February 2015 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA691A6F12 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySlu8TurRGzK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A371A6FFD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037EADA0139 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C558353E07D; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (65.19.75.136) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:39 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C601AA4-55C4-43FE-B2FE-1D22BD73F166@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 07:45:36 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <D9243769-02D9-4964-954B-94FF88607969@nominum.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <732CCD31-0F13-472F-9825-C5F5D650C41B@vigilsec.com> <2457EE06-4960-40B5-AF10-2EDFBF18B2B6@nominum.com> <7C601AA4-55C4-43FE-B2FE-1D22BD73F166@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [65.19.75.136]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CcgfH_eQdONrAA6WClp-dD10gCI>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:45:42 -0000

On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:40 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> We disagree.  Many people tell us (on the IAOC surveys) that the most important thing that happens at IETF meetings is the hallway conversations.  It is a significant part of the culture.

We don't actually disagree that much.   I agree that the most important thing that happens at IETF meetings is hallway conversations.   Where I appear to disagree with you is that I think that someone who has been participating in IETF for some time will do what it takes to get the same effect some other way if they are not able to attend in person.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email