Re: Updating BCP 10 -- round two

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 11 February 2015 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347571A8982 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:34:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qfKHqojSDH-T for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E664D1A8968 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48647E00C; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:41:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D028263A21; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:34:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E2963A1F; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:34:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- round two
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbGG2=VgmUWEE6W3D+0qennThqnCP85X0Q85i94meu68g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbGG2=VgmUWEE6W3D+0qennThqnCP85X0Q85i94meu68g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:34:14 -0500
Message-ID: <6409.1423672454@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CdWy2N1g_hGVhL0sBNBzCQLb26A>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:34:29 -0000

Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>; wrote:
    > (b) Michael's suggestion to re-work eligibility (needs more discussion or
    > an actual text proposal).

So far, I'm not hearing much support or any clear opposition for the idea.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-