Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Mon, 11 February 2013 22:48 UTC
Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952CE21F8873 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.498, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnXKT8HtSJfZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f170.google.com (mail-ve0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF6921F8869 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 14so5623943vea.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=x-received:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=m6aEM5y/LJJnq+1qynLT4lQFS1+nYiwoqy5t+pB71lU=; b=mumVuLmjOvSDjFKYG1a1qZfUAdYR3MYu/gpA4xlEK8ZxUjHiJ09IJFOaotwGHQneW0 gsHt90EJIh2OwHKVHAaYeZGRopU8/YJZ63yItFdJxN6odw9zKTZ/d0Cr6HxXi60eJ1Pf L9xChVB1h449MK0I3gUUxhJnb5La/GntYOP64=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=m6aEM5y/LJJnq+1qynLT4lQFS1+nYiwoqy5t+pB71lU=; b=hiyMAqzDIBWt/MhYkI89r8DNPInWV2Wf3qaYX94TbF8bTenkFRinVdYKYQy34OilY9 aOvKqV0QhUHkC3dJF9vYRldVh8JtI3TOQBuQG7pfjIOzviwCtB9+RIsyAS7aUX71ABPO 8KckgxYMQE0C7NLTSCKth0gF76pJt0ceJ+diYYkWy4MieVqT8d+egQX5CGB1Z3DhJLDz 3S1SLtbCIAl+B216Y2PiUN4P/AYy648dWTGPWG7z7j1B8U+L2ogsKByEMZ8Oh0ESxsOM L9kOY33ucs6bdo7EBFav4R2H0lCUnmgsXg8Nkwj34yCdHeM2Hjx87jFEDEYRMa/C90DA NFXg==
X-Received: by 10.52.88.237 with SMTP id bj13mr18326167vdb.75.1360622917624; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <CADnDZ8_E-cDqhXWV-f3MjoDo9hFeCVAdVTmRQ+McA--_3smyJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFGdiwFiRkVtUQLR6b89c3SdpVcOmHULe35hwd+wg8CsA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_wCFNsWXdQv29RpVrFnzZLeuBybaBEPR63OvUxw-ieyQ@mail.gmail.com> <51180ad8.0727dc0a.7e34.ffffeb5cSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CADnDZ89ckeZzVzU7d_ru=9U9qdhQ=R6rmJRteHDj0SwDw+jv6g@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130211104011.0b8299d0@resistor.net> <CAK=bVC9=vmtTvdrj93gMtJA_7yih9BOzQbCURH-2zaVFuoHG7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCy3JCROqDTqW9wU-RDUp0CQ_4kPtGLNCO_Tzx7E34FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCy3JCROqDTqW9wU-RDUp0CQ_4kPtGLNCO_Tzx7E34FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:48:37 -0800
Message-ID: <-7188438076852587393@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec50160d7ada2e004d57ab508"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQny43vch2E6l0+xn2GSqmos1Oem++TKIuz64pMDiXsUFcjMtZyg3jo+/XDeBmueExrXUzPB
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:48:39 -0000
Alright, it's not important for this discussion anyway; just ignore my comment. Ulrich Sent from my iPhone On Feb 11, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > SM, > (it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name). Hi, Ulrich. This is actually a very cultural issue. I'll point out that in U.S. culture it's common for people named William to go by "Bill", or for people to regularly use nicknames such as "Bud" or "Woody". Do we call those "real" names? For south Asians, Thais, and others with very long names, it's culturally common to use abbreviations -- someone named "Gopalakrishnan" might be "Gopal", and use of initials is common. SM is well known here by his initials, and switching to "Subramanian Moonesamy" won't benefit anyone. He knows the IETF culture as well as his own, and "SM" is perfectly fine, and is what we know him by. Does that help? Barry
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Melinda Shore
- The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Donald Eastlake
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement John C Klensin
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement ned+ietf
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Melinda Shore
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Eric Burger
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Dale R. Worley
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Barry Leiba
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Hector Santos
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Michael StJohns
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Dean Willis
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement SM
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Bradner, Scott
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Ulrich Herberg
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Barry Leiba
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Ulrich Herberg
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement joel jaeggli
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement joel jaeggli
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic) SM
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic) Ulrich Herberg
- Re: The RFC Acknowledgement Bob Hinden