Re: Fw: Pass the hat for ICANN ?

["Jim Fleming" <[e-mail]>]

@@@@ http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/poisson-charter.html

- Discuss the relationship between IETF and ICANN. Should the IETF be
participating in ICANN at all? If so, as part of the ICANN PSO? Under which
conditions?

An RFC detailing the position will be published if the WG decides that the
IETF should not be part of the ICANN PSO. RFC on proposed ICANN PSO bylaws
will be produced if the WG consensus is in favor of joining the PSO.
Furthermore, in the latter case an RFC will be produced that describes how
ICANN PSO officers (on behalf of the IETF) are to be selected.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker <[e-mail]>
To: Jim Fleming <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jim Fleming <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Karl
Auerbach <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; John M. Brown <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Jason
Hendeles <[e-mail]>; James Love <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Don Heath <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Dan Steinberg
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; Bernard A. Galler <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; Barbara Simons <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>; Steve Coya <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, July 09, 1999 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Pass the hat for ICANN ?


>At 07:27 AM 7/9/99 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
>>Then why is the ICANN coming to Norway this week to the IETF meeting ?
>
>Your ability to leap to irrational deductions from irrelevant facts is
amazing.
>
>the fact is that *they* are attending the *IETF* meeting. The *IETF* is
>doing nothing whatsoever to fund them.
>
>And I have a complaint. I replied privately to your public email, asking
>you to not post off-topic comments to the IETF list. You replied publicly
>to my private email, copying the IETF list, with an off-topic comment. Why
>did you do that?
>