Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 19 February 2016 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA711A8A05 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4H1K9CCHtn-G for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5611A8ABB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3q6Dyh0qJ3z3mg; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:58:36 +0100 (CET)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgEwGT3lo1YB; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:58:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:58:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7DC576000062; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:58:31 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 7DC576000062
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7E625936; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:58:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:58:31 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
In-Reply-To: <56C65E03.8090507@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602190858030.17655@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20160216224341.4620.qmail@ary.lan> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602172221020.27439@bofh.nohats.ca> <19DDAD6C-B997-48C3-83E5-A61E27D97B6A@dukhovni.org> <56C65E03.8090507@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CnhMrM_douGLt-tAk2zzz-dbKFU>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:58:43 -0000

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Agreed. I think it might make sense to add a bit of text to all
> the drafts in this space. Would something like the following be
> useful to include in this and other similar drafts?
>
> "This specification is one experiment in improving access to public keys
> for end-to-end email security. There are a range of ways in which this
> can reasonably be done, for OpenPGP or S/MIME, for example using the
> DNS, or SMTP, or HTTP.  Proposals for each of these have been made with
> various levels of support in terms of implementation and deployment.
> For each such experiment, specifications such as this will enable
> experiments to be carried out that may succeed or that may uncover
> technical or other impediments to large- or small-scale deployments. The
> IETF encourages those implementing and deploying such experiments to
> publicly document their experiences so that future specifications in
> this space can benefit."

I'm fine with adding this text to the Introduction.

Paul